Skip to content
Blue BirdModel report

Blue Bird Vision Problems by Model Year

NHTSA recorded 6 consumer complaints across the 1 model years of the Blue Bird Vision (2009–2009) that have at least 5 complaints. 2009 has the most, with 6. Across all years, the part named most often is fuel system (2 mentions). Pick a model year below to see its parts, mileage, recalls and service bulletins.

All Vision model years

Years with fewer than 5 complaints are not listed. The score compares years of the same model, allowing for the era and for how long each year has collected complaints: 50 is a typical year, lower means fewer complaints. It is not adjusted for sales volume.

YearComplaintsMedian miRecallsTSBsScore (50 = typical)Trend
200968,3502828—Not enough data

Parts named most often, all years

Counts add up complaint mentions across the listed years. A complaint can name several parts.

Example complaints

One per model year, chosen for length and detail. Personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

2009: “A 2009 bluebird Vision school bus developed a fuel (diesel) leak and caught fire. It fully engulfed the bus burning it to a total loss. One special needs student, a transportation aide, and the driver were on board. All evacuated safely. We recently received 46 of these buses (all configured the same) and we have had 8 incidents of fuel leaks involving 6 of these units, not including the bus which caught fire. Our district has met with bluebird and caterpillar (engine supplier) and looked at the burned unit. We are waiting for their comments from this. …”

NHTSA complaint #10269625, filed 2009-05, 8,350 miles

Other Blue Bird models

Blue Bird TC2000
29 complaints
Blue Bird ALL American
26 complaints
Blue Bird School BUS
7 complaints
Blue Bird Wanderlodge M450 LXI
7 complaints
Blue Bird Conventional
7 complaints
Blue Bird Blue Bird
5 complaints

All Blue Bird models →

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 27, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Methodology