Skip to content
Body and structurePart report

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Body and structure Problems

Complaints
5about this part
Share
14%of 37 total for the year
Median mileage
108,000miles
Trend
Not enough dataFewer than 15 complaints, too few for a reliable trend.

NHTSA recorded 5 complaints about the body and structure of the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer, 14% of the 37 complaints for this model year. Where a mileage was given, the median is 108,000 miles.

Fewer than 15 complaints name this part, so treat the figures as a rough indication only.

Example complaints

Selected from NHTSA records; personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

“Rear chassis member (a frame rail) corroded close to the point where rear subframe is connected. It is now a safety concern to drive the vehicle as any significant impact may cause the rear suspension to detach. There was already a recall on rust of the front subframe however it seems that the problem is in inadequate undercarriage protection”

NHTSA complaint #11245354, filed 2019-08, 116,000 miles

“Rear frame rail rust. The car stated to accumulate rust on the frame rails of the car that connects the rear subframe and rear toe arm. Failure of these areas could lead to a crash. The manufacturer did a poor job corrosion proofing this area on this model year. The car had a 7 year/ 100,000 rust warranty in which I am sure this problem developed within that coverage but was hard to notice until rust started forming on the outside frame which is hard to see without jacking up the car.”

NHTSA complaint #11326274, filed 2020-05, 99,000 miles

“Rear frame rails rust close to points where the rear subframe is bolted on. Insufficient sealant/coating causes rust damage that can lead to structural weakness.”

NHTSA complaint #11242262, filed 2019-08, 100,000 miles

“My lancer has very bad rear end chassis rust where the rear subframe is fastened to the monobody. In this area all the suspension components and rear drivetrain are located. Damage occurs due to salt and other corrosive agents that are used for roads in Connecticut to melt snow. These agents rust the car where Mitsubishi failed to properly protect the steel under the rear end of the vehicle. …”

NHTSA complaint #11455652, filed 2022-03

“The contact owns a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. The contact stated while working on the vehicle, the contact noticed that there was a huge hole in the sub-frame due to rust. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer and it was diagnosed that the sub-frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact related the failure to an unknown recall. The manufacturer was not informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 196,000. The VIN was unavailable.”

NHTSA complaint #11418918, filed 2021-05, 196,000 miles

Related service bulletins

Body and structure: other model years

YearComplaintsShare of year
2017117%
201627%
201529%
2014319%
201215%
2011412%
201012%
200966%
20081011%
2006514%
200528%
200434%
2003137%
200275%

Other parts of the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Air bags
16 complaints
Suspension
9 complaints
Brakes
4 complaints
Exterior lighting
4 complaints
Vehicle speed control
3 complaints
Other or unknown
2 complaints
Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors)
2 complaints
Electrical system
1 complaints
Electronic stability control
1 complaints
Engine cooling
1 complaints
Equipment
1 complaints
Steering
1 complaints

← All problems reported for the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 28, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

To check a specific vehicle for open recalls, use its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. Methodology