Newmar Scottsdale Problems by Model Year
NHTSA recorded 5 consumer complaints across the 1 model years of the Newmar Scottsdale (2004–2004) that have at least 5 complaints. 2004 has the most, with 5. Across all years, the part named most often is body and structure (1 mentions). Pick a model year below to see its parts, mileage, recalls and service bulletins.
All Scottsdale model years
Years with fewer than 5 complaints are not listed. The score compares years of the same model, allowing for the era and for how long each year has collected complaints: 50 is a typical year, lower means fewer complaints. It is not adjusted for sales volume.
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | TSBs | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 5 | 19,186 | 6 | 4 | — | Not enough data |
Parts named most often, all years
Counts add up complaint mentions across the listed years. A complaint can name several parts.
- Body and structure1 17%
- Exterior lighting1 17%
- Engine cooling1 17%
- Electronic stability control1 17%
- Electrical system1 17%
- Brakes1 17%
Example complaints
One per model year, chosen for length and detail. Personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.
2004: “At any speed, when vehicle hits a bump in the road it will cause the vehicle to pitch back and forth and rock from side to side. Dealer claims that this is normal, and suggests that the consumer break the vehicle in. This pitching and rocking problem occurred several times since ownership of the vehicle. The dealer replaced the suspension once, and problem recurred.”
NHTSA complaint #10057457, filed 2004-02, 4,000 milesOther Newmar models
141 complaintsNewmar Mountain Aire
37 complaintsNewmar Kountry Star
27 complaintsNewmar NEW Aire
18 complaintsNewmar BAY Star
11 complaintsNewmar London Aire
10 complaintsNewmar Kountry Aire
5 complaintsNewmar BAY Star Sport
5 complaints
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Methodology