Skip to content
Chevrolet CamaroModel year report

1997 Chevrolet Camaro Problems

Complaints
69filed with NHTSA
Median mileage
63,492miles, 12 complaints with mileage
Recalls
1campaigns on record
Trend
StableComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are within 25% of the 3 years before.
NHTSA crash rating
—overall rating starts with 2011 models
EPA fuel economy
20 mpgcombined, 3.8L 6-cyl RWD · 17 city / 26 hwy

Sources: NHTSA records for the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error

What owners report

Owners of this model year most often describe cooling-system problems, with coolant leaks, gunked-up or stuck thermostats, and overheating topping the list. A second cluster concerns front lighting: turn signal and daytime running lamp bulbs and sockets failing or behaving oddly, with the DRL module and wiring cited as the source. Brake complaints tend to appear on higher-mileage cars and describe rear brakes that drag or wear out early, while airbag non-deployment is reported mostly from crashes.

  1. Exterior lighting

    Turn signal and daytime running lamp failures

    • 6 complaints (9%)
    • median 24,000 mi at 8.6 yrs old (3 state mileage, few)
    • 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
    • filed 1999–2013

    Complaints describe turn signals that fail to blink, stay lit steadily after a turn, or blow bulbs repeatedly, along with parking lights that stay on constantly and sockets that look burned or shorted. Several owners attribute this to the daytime running lamp module and its wiring, and some reports note the dealer could not resolve it. Some owners raised a separate concern that when one lamp fails the other stays lit and can be mistaken for a turn signal. Reported across a wide mileage range, from cars around 19,000-24,000 miles up to about 39,000 miles; both low-mileage and older vehicles appear.

    What to check: With the engine running, check that all front and rear turn signal and parking lamps work and that the signal self-cancels. Look at the bulb sockets for scorching or melted plastic and ask whether the DRL module or wiring has been replaced.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “This is a general observation of the 1997 and newer Camaro and firebird. If a bulb burns out in the turn signal drl system, the remaining bulb can be misinterpreted as a turn signal instead of a drl. I suggest recalling all such vehicles and disconnecting the drls or require the manufacturer to wire such drls in series. I've filed a similar comment in docket 4124.”

    NHTSA complaint #741749, filed 2001-03

    “Since vehicle purchase turn signal and parking yellow lights were constantly illuminating. Consumer assumed that vehicle was supposed to operate that way. When the right turn signal light blew, consumer took car to dealer, who diagnosed as a electrical wiring problem with vehicle.”

    NHTSA complaint #10024317, filed 2003-06, 24,000 miles
  2. Air bags

    Airbags not deploying in a crash

    • 7 complaints (10%)
    • median 110,000 mi at 7.5 yrs old (1 states mileage, few)
    • 5 mention a crash, fire or injury
    • filed 1996–2004

    Owners report that airbags did not deploy in frontal, side and multi-impact crashes, including impacts at roughly 20-50 mph, and some describe injuries to occupants who hit the windshield or dashboard. In one case both the airbag and the seat belt were reported as not working in the crash. These are accounts of events after a collision rather than a symptom noticed beforehand. Mileage was not recorded in most of these reports, so no mileage pattern can be drawn.

    What to check: Ask whether the airbag warning lamp comes on and goes out normally at startup and whether the system has ever been serviced after a collision. A diagnostic scan for stored airbag codes is a reasonable pre-purchase step on a car this age.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “While driving 20-25 MPH had a direct frontal impact, and driver's/passenger's airbags did not deploy, which did not protect the occupant in this crash. Also the seatbelt system malfunctioned, causing the occupant to hit the front windshield. Please provide further information.”

    NHTSA complaint #851124, filed 1999-10

    “When vehicle was involved in a single car crash, hitting a ditch embankment, destroying front end, there was no deployment of air bags and driver suffered facial injuries. Vehicle has been totalled.”

    NHTSA complaint #811817, filed 1997-04
  3. Engine cooling

    Coolant leaks, rust and overheating

    • 5 complaints (7%)
    • median 74,792 mi at 6.2 yrs old (2 state mileage, few)
    • 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
    • filed 2000–2004

    Owners describe coolant leaking, sometimes with the dealer saying the coolant had broken down and affected engine parts, and other reports of heavy rust in the cooling system, gummed-up thermostats that stick, and false temperature readings leading to overheating. One owner reported repeated engine running problems taken to the dealer many times without a lasting fix. Complaints also mention water pump replacement and repeated intake manifold gasket and oil leak work. Reported from fairly low mileage upward, including one car around 59,000 miles; no single condition dominates.

    2 related service bulletins

    What to check: Check coolant condition and level, look for rust-colored residue in the overflow tank, and ask whether the thermostat and water pump have been replaced. Watch the temperature gauge on a test drive in traffic.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “Within 5 months of purchase (the mileage was 59585 when issues began) I began having issues with the engine, and took my car to the dealership over 10 times over the next year, and was charged $500 every time for them to put new spark plugs and wires and send me home only to come back a month later with the same problem only worse. This lasted until my warranty expired and then I was told I needed a new engine. …”

    NHTSA complaint #10005061, filed 2003-02, 59,585 miles

    “Dealer has been jerking me around. Replaced the intake manifold gasket once. Year went by, got another oil leak and the water pump went up. Took to the dealership, they replaced water pump, but didn't fill the coolant back up. They alleged to have fixed the intake manifold gasket again. Still getting an oil leak. Checked the problem myslef and found oil coming from pinion seal. Dealership said that it wasn't leaking when I just had the water pump fixed. …”

    NHTSA complaint #716911, filed 2000-01
  4. Brakes

    Rear brakes dragging or wearing early

    • 7 complaints (10%)
    • median 152,690 mi at 19.2 yrs old (1 states mileage, few)
    • 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
    • filed 1998–2015

    Owners describe rear disc pads wearing out far sooner than the fronts, uneven pad wear giving a rough stopping feel, squealing, and calipers or hardware that do not release, so the car behaves as if the brakes are on. One owner also noted that in icy conditions the rear wheels did not seem to brake when the fronts stopped. Some reports say the dealer found nothing wrong. Mostly on higher-mileage cars, with one report near 24,000 miles and another around 152,000 miles; icy or slippery surfaces come up in one account.

    What to check: Ask for rear brake service records and check that rear rotors are not scored, cracked or unusually dirty with brake dust. After a drive, feel for excessive heat at the rear wheels and have the calipers checked for sticking.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “This car is a 97 z28 with the 350ci motor and 4 speed auto transmission. What happens is that when the front wheels are not turning, the rear brakes do not engage, no matter how hard you push down on the brake pedal. The issue presents itself under icy conditions. The first time it happened was when I pulled into a spot at a fast food place, the parking spot was icy while the rest of the lot was ice free. As I pulled into the spot, I put on my brakes and the front wheels stopped, but the rear did not. …”

    NHTSA complaint #10816172, filed 2015-12, 152,690 miles

    “Since I bought the car new, it has gone through 4 sets of rear disc pads. The pads have uneven wear from top to bottom which make the car have a not smooth stopping feel. The most recent incident on 6/2002 was the rear brakes making a loud squeeling noise when stopping at a traffic light. The rear wheels are more dirty than the front wheels. Normally, the fronts would be more dirty than the rears. This leads me to believe the rear brakes are hanging up on the rotor (not releasing). …”

    NHTSA complaint #763058, filed 2002-06

Buying note. On a car this age, the cooling system and the front lighting and wiring are the areas owners most often describe problems with, so budget for a cooling-system inspection and a full lighting check. Ask for service records on the rear brakes and have the steering and airbag systems inspected before purchase.

Summary written with AI from a sample of 44 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.

NHTSA recorded 69 consumer complaints for the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. 12 of the complaints include a mileage, and 33% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 63,492 miles. Of all complaints, 12 involved a crash, 3 a fire, 9 an injury, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 1 recall campaign and 20 technical service bulletins for this model year.

Not compared (before 2008). Model years 2008–2023 of the same vehicle that have at least 25 complaints are compared, and a model needs at least 3 of them.

Which parts are reported most

Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.

Also reported: Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors) (4), Other or unknown (2), Seat belts (2), Seats (2), Tires (1), Vehicle speed control (1).

Example complaints

Engine cooling: “Engine cuts out when hood gets wet, whether by rain or by washing the car. I took the car to the dealer and was told that the system worked as designed. They said, it is typical for this type vehicle to miss and run rough if water gets onto distributor asm under front of vehicle. There is no fix for this problem. You have to park the car and wait for it to dry out to be able to drive the car again.”

NHTSA complaint #714354, filed 1999-11

Brakes: “Electrical - driver side parking light out & blinker, tail light dull. Bulb replacement does not fix problem which has been this way for 2.5 years. Disc hardware sticking, calipers binding, not releasing when brakes released causing an effect as if riding brakes causing premature weae and loss of brakes. Rear rotor cracked in 3 places.”

NHTSA complaint #718041, filed 2000-01

Air bags: “1997 Camaro-the rear wheel axle spindle broke causing the rear wheel to break off while traveling at 45mph. Vehicle caused driver to loose control hit head on in a ditch embankment, then rolling over and sliding about 15 ft. Thus causing whiplash to the driver and complete total of vehicle”

NHTSA complaint #731400, filed 2000-09

Exterior lighting: “1997 through 2002 Camaro's equipped with daytime running lights may experience failures of turn signals. Failures include failure of turn signals to illuminate or failure to blink. Failures may also include premature bulb failure to headlights, turn signals (front and rear), and parking lights. I have encountered numerous vehicles with front and rear turn signal sockets burned/ shorted. The turn signals operate through the daytime running light module and module is prone to failure/ overheat/ shorting causing failure of turn signals. …”

NHTSA complaint #10510671, filed 2013-05, 39,000 miles

Mileage when problems were reported

33% of the 12 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 39,000 and 94,000 miles.

0%0–1025%10–258%25–5025%50–7517%75–10017%100–1508%150+
Share of complaints by mileage when the problem was reported, in thousands of miles (12 complaints with mileage). Red bars: under 50,000 miles. Bucket widths differ. Median: 63,492 miles.

Complaints by year filed

Trend: stable. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are within 25% of the 3 years before.

’96’9819’00’02’04’10’15
Complaints by year the complaint was filed with NHTSA. Red bars: the last 3 full calendar years used for the trend. The current year (2026) is partial.

Crash test ratings

NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.

VersionOverallFrontalSideSide poleRollover
Camaro · coupe not rated5 / 5———

Ratings before the 2011 model year come from an older, less demanding test and are not comparable with ratings for 2011 and later.

Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.

Fuel economy and running cost

EPA ratings for each 1997 Chevrolet Camaro version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).

VersionEngineTransmissionCityHwyComb.Fuel / yr
Camaro RWD3.8L 6-cyl4-speed automatic172620$3,350
Camaro RWD3.8L 6-cyl5-speed manual172820$3,350
Camaro RWD5.7L 8-cyl4-speed automatic152318$4,550
Camaro RWD5.7L 8-cyl6-speed manual152418$4,550

Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.

Recalls and investigations

Recall details for the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro → · Check a VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls

NHTSA investigations

Technical service bulletins

TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 20 on record; the latest 10 are shown.

See all 20 bulletins →

Other model years of the Chevrolet Camaro

YearComplaintsMedian miRecallsCrash ★MPGScore (50 = typical)Trend
202316—0520—Too new
20221423,0001520—Not enough data
20212049,3304520—Stable
20203221,00035208 · FewerRising
20195312,47515200 · FewerRising
20188121,000252025 · FewerRising
201719021,655352066 · MoreStable
201614120,3151—2237 · TypicalStable
201520638,000151929 · FewerFalling
201418837,400351952 · TypicalFalling
201318740,000351950 · TypicalFalling
201211334,000451955 · TypicalFalling
201119440,0002—2050 · TypicalStable
201029548,0002—2166 · MoreFalling
20026820,0001—21Not compared (before 2008)Falling
20014843,0000—21Not compared (before 2008)Stable
20007652,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Rising
19999057,0001—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
199817343,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19976963,4921—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
199611658,0750—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
1995216104,0421—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
1994144130,5001—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19933297,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19928896,0842—18Not compared (before 2008)Falling
19918694,2504—18Not compared (before 2008)Falling
199025160,0002—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
198925119,0003—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19881776,0002—18—Stable
19872875,0001—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19863299,9604—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19854650,0003—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19843999,0005—19Not compared (before 2008)Stable
198316172,5003———Stable
19796245,1362———Not enough data

All Chevrolet Camaro model years · Best and worst years by complaints

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems with the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro?

Owners of this model year most often describe cooling-system problems, with coolant leaks, gunked-up or stuck thermostats, and overheating topping the list. The issues reported most often: Turn signal and daytime running lamp failures; Airbags not deploying in a crash; Coolant leaks, rust and overheating.

How many NHTSA complaints does the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro have?

NHTSA recorded 69 consumer complaints for the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro as of Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

What part of the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is reported most often?

Engine cooling is named most often, in 13 complaints (19% of the total), followed by brakes with 10.

Has the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro been recalled?

NHTSA lists 1 recall campaign for this model year. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

What gas mileage does the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro get?

The EPA rates the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (Camaro, 3.8L 6-cyl) at 20 mpg combined, 17 city and 26 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,350 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.

At what mileage are problems with the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro reported?

Among the 12 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 63,492 miles and the middle half falls between 39,000 and 94,000 miles; 33% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).

Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.