Skip to content
Chevrolet CamaroModel year report

2000 Chevrolet Camaro Problems

Complaints
76filed with NHTSA
Median mileage
52,000miles, 21 complaints with mileage
Recalls
0campaigns on record
Trend
RisingComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% higher than in the 3 years before.
NHTSA crash rating
—overall rating starts with 2011 models
EPA fuel economy
20 mpgcombined, 3.8L 6-cyl RWD · 17 city / 26 hwy

Sources: NHTSA records for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error

What owners report

Owners of this model year report a wide spread of problems rather than one dominant failure. Brake shudder from warped rotors and repeated rotor replacement come up often, alongside manual-transmission troubles and clutch complaints at low mileage, catalytic converter failures with check-engine lights, and stalling or rough running in warm weather. Several electrical complaints involve the security system refusing to crank and flickering lights.

  1. Brakes

    Warped brake rotors and pedal/steering shudder

    • 11 complaints (14%)
    • median 83,100 mi at 5.6 yrs old (2 state mileage, few)
    • filed 2000–2008

    Complaints describe vibration, shudder or jerking felt through the vehicle when the brakes are applied, and owners say the cause given was warped or prematurely worn rotors. Several report the rotors were turned or replaced more than once and the vibration returned within a few thousand miles. Some owners say the dealer described the condition as common on this model or attributed it to driving habits or water on hot brakes. Reported from roughly 10,000 to just past 100,000 miles, with several cases in the 19,000-46,000 mile range and repeat failures soon after repair.

    What to check: Drive the car and brake firmly from highway speed to feel for pulsation through the pedal or wheel, and ask for brake service records showing how often rotors were replaced or resurfaced.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “Car has required service 2 times for warped rotors after only 25000 miles. Neither repair was covered under warranty. First time, the service people said we must have driven the car through water when the brakes were hot. 2nd time they say we are driving the car aggressively or in a lot of traffic, but admit that this is a common problem with Camaro ss and corvette. This seems to be a design flaw in the car, if the brake rotor regularly become warped.”

    NHTSA complaint #10032847, filed 2003-08

    “I first experienced the brake system problem at 10000 miles. I was informed by the dealership that they did not do brake system repairs on saturday's and I would have to call back and reschedule for an appointment. When I was finally able to get the car into the shop for repairs, I was informed that the rotors were warped and they would need to be turned down. I agreed to the repair and 8 days later I was able to pick my car up. Within 5000 miles of the repair I was back in the shop with the same complaint. …”

    NHTSA complaint #754039, filed 2001-11
  2. Engine cooling

    Stalling, erratic idle and hard hot restarts

    • 8 complaints (11%)
    • median 79,000 mi at 7.6 yrs old (3 state mileage, few)
    • filed 2000–2008

    Owners describe the engine dying at speed, at stops or in traffic, sometimes with the check gauges light on and restarting right away, and other times refusing to start when hot until it cools. Complaints mention rough or fluctuating idle, particularly after coming out of gear, and stalling in warm weather with the air conditioning on. Some report the dealer could not locate the fault or replaced parts such as the battery without lasting result. Spread from around 9,000 to 79,000 miles, with several reports from cars used in warm weather or stop-and-go traffic.

    4 related service bulletins

    What to check: Start the car cold and again after a warm drive with a short heat soak, let it idle in gear with the air conditioning on, and ask whether idle control or throttle parts were replaced.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “When attempting to leave a friends house my 2000 chevy Camaro (3.8 l v6) would not stay running. After taking the car to the local mechanic it was discovered that the isc motor had blown. Dealers and the manufacturer could not locate an isc motor right away. It turns out that this motor is actually part of the vehicles throttle body. The part that malfunctioned can only be purchased separately for the 5.8l v8, or so we are told, whereas the 3.8l engine must purchase the entire component. …”

    NHTSA complaint #10206225, filed 2007-10, 79,000 miles

    “Engine idles very eratically. Head lights dim on braking-inside dash and radio lights flicker-shifts into 1st gear harsh-voltage drops in the red causing car to almost stall-when turning on air conditioner there is a load whinning noise- car runs eractic on startup-locked up in reverse once-car shakes while driving-clicking noise in the dash-have been to shop over and over for these problems- first it was nothing,then the serp.,belt,then the alternator,now it is my radio causing these problems (so I am told) car still not fixed. …”

    NHTSA complaint #748108, filed 2001-07
  3. Electrical system

    Security system blocks cranking; lights flicker

    • 8 complaints (11%)
    • median 98,000 mi at 6.8 yrs old (2 state mileage, few)
    • 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
    • filed 2001–2008

    Complaints describe the security message appearing and the car refusing to crank for several minutes, sometimes fixed by a reset of the system. Owners also report headlights and dash or radio lights flickering or dimming, bulbs burning out soon after replacement, and a horn that stopped working after moisture exposure. Mostly reported between about 31,000 and 120,000 miles, with flickering lights also noted at highway speed early in ownership.

    3 related service bulletins

    What to check: Confirm the car cranks reliably from cold and after sitting, cycle the headlights and dash lights at night, and ask whether the security system or ignition switch has been serviced.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “When headlights are on, and vehicle reaches speeds of 50 MPH and more headlights will start to flicker. Contacted dealer, and the dealer stated that there was nothing they could do because they could not dupicate problem during day when they test drove vehicle. Consumer states asr button is extremely hot and the driver side brake light shorts out.”

    NHTSA complaint #892362, filed 2001-07

    “The vehicle experienced problems with the front end pulling to the right, even when you turn to the left there was no response causing the vehicle to veer off the road and hit utilities and an embankment, consumer injured neck/ back, and chest . Also 3 days prior to this accident the traction control system failed while driving 40 (in a 55 zone) while raining, consumer went into a skid and ran off the road but there was no property damage. …”

    NHTSA complaint #749511, filed 2001-07
  4. Transmission and drivetrain

    Manual transmission gear and clutch problems

    • 8 complaints (11%)
    • median 13,900 mi at 6.7 yrs old (2 state mileage, few)
    • filed 2000–2008

    Owners of cars with the manual gearbox describe gears dropping out, grinding when engaging reverse or first, and difficulty shifting. Complaints also mention the clutch slipping once it gets hot and a clutch pedal return spring that broke and was replaced, then broke again. Some owners say dealers could not find a problem or told them the condition was normal. Several reports arrive under 15,000 miles, with others in the 30,000-40,000 mile range and one at about 120,000 miles.

    4 related service bulletins

    What to check: Test every gear including reverse when the car is warm, listen for grinding, and check whether the clutch slips under acceleration; ask about prior gearbox or clutch work.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “The clutch pedal return spring on my 2000 Camaro ss broke two years ago. I purchased another one from a local GM dealer. I could not believe the spring was so expensive. ($70.00). I installed the spring my self in 2006 and two years later 2008 the spring broke again. I only drive the car in the summer months. (26,000 kilometers). I do not abuse the car in any way. I believe this is a design defect. I think that a clutch pedal return spring should last longer than two years at $70 a pop.”

    NHTSA complaint #10242154, filed 2008-09, 13,800 miles

    “Bad manual transmissions in the f-body's concerning the six speed. I have a 2000 Camaro ss with 34000 miles on it and my original transmission's 5th gear went out at 14000, note my car is not under warranty because of a reconditioned title. But I have purchased another used 6 speed from a local recycling yard and 3rd gear was out of it. Finally I found a local recycler that could get me a rebuilt transmission. Purchased it and installed with all 6 gears ok but now reverse is grinding. …”

    NHTSA complaint #10065664, filed 2004-04, 14,000 miles
  5. Engine cooling

    Catalytic converter failure and check-engine light

    • 5 complaints (7%)
    • median 83,000 mi at 8.7 yrs old (3 state mileage, few)
    • filed 2001–2008

    Complaints describe the check-engine light coming on with a converter-related diagnosis, failed emissions tests, and rattling or breaking-up baffles inside the converter. Owners mention converter warranty coverage being refused or partly charged back to them, for example for rusted fasteners or a seized oxygen sensor. Some also describe oil consumption that the dealer called normal. Reports range from about 20,000 miles to over 90,000 miles, including cars driven only a few thousand miles a year and stored part of the year.

    4 related service bulletins

    What to check: Ask whether the converter was replaced under the emissions warranty and request any related repair invoices; check for a stored or pending check-engine code before purchase.

    2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records

    “I had a special policy sent to me for the catalytic converter on my 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. I took the car in to let them test to see if that was why my service engine light was on and it was. They ordered the part and I took it in for repair. Parts and labor were to be covered. The dealership calls me to inform me that my bolts were severly rusted and I would be responsible for the bolts if they broke. They had to remove the bolts regardless if they were rusted or not and I had to pay for the labor that was suppose to be covered. …”

    NHTSA complaint #10183391, filed 2007-02, 93,000 miles

    “The vehicles check engine light came on. The catalytic converter failed per the diagnostic check at the dealership. The catalytic converter is covered by special 10 year or 120,000 mile warranty. The dealership says the good oxygen sensor is probably seized and it will break due to age when they replace the catalytic converter. They want us to pay $208 for a new oxygen sensor.”

    NHTSA complaint #10231852, filed 2008-06, 83,000 miles

Buying note. These cars are old enough that condition and records matter more than the badge, so get a pre-purchase inspection that covers brakes, clutch and gearbox, and stored codes. Ask specifically about repeat brake rotor work, converter replacement under the emissions warranty, and any electrical or security-system repairs.

Summary written with AI from a sample of 60 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.

NHTSA recorded 76 consumer complaints for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. 21 of the complaints include a mileage, and 43% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 52,000 miles. Of all complaints, 6 involved a crash, 1 a fire, 8 an injury, 3 a death, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 0 recall campaigns and 238 technical service bulletins for this model year.

Not compared (before 2008). Model years 2008–2023 of the same vehicle that have at least 25 complaints are compared, and a model needs at least 3 of them.

Which parts are reported most

Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.

Also reported: Equipment (3), Fuel system (3), Latches, locks and linkages (3), Tires (3), Other or unknown (2), Seat belts (2), Seats (2), Body and structure (2), Electronic stability control (1).

Example complaints

Transmission and drivetrain: “Clutch seems to slip quicker than normal. Only about 6500 miles on the vehicle and the clutch begins to slip. I have gotten the new slave cylinder, but it still happends. Only happends when the clutch gets hot on my vehicle.”

NHTSA complaint #723865, filed 2000-06

Brakes: “Design flaw. E-brake dragging constantly which eventually warps the rotor and if left alone makes a horrible clunking noise that almost sounds like your differential spit a tooth. A little difficult to explain exactly what's happening but find it hard to believe Chevrolet hasn't figured it out. Yes, of course they have! It's just that hundreds of people haven't died.”

NHTSA complaint #10243586, filed 2008-09, 120,000 miles

Engine cooling: “While driving in warm weather with the A/C on, the vehicle stalled when it came to a stop or when in heavy traffic. The vehicle could be restarted but would continue to stall until the vehicle was out of traffic. The diagnostic test could not determine the problem. The stalling occurred many times since the vehicle was purchased.”

NHTSA complaint #10044411, filed 2003-11, 9,000 miles

Electrical system: “The contact owns a 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. The contact attempted to start the vehicle, but was unsuccessful. A local mechanic performed a diagnostic test and informed her that the security system needed to be reset. The dealer and the manufacturer have not been notified. The vehicle has not been repaired. The VIN was unknown. The current and failure mileages were 120,000.”

NHTSA complaint #10246098, filed 2008-10, 120,000 miles

Mileage when problems were reported

43% of the 21 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 31,000 and 93,000 miles.

5%0–1019%10–2519%25–5014%50–7519%75–10019%100–1505%150+
Share of complaints by mileage when the problem was reported, in thousands of miles (21 complaints with mileage). Red bars: under 50,000 miles. Bucket widths differ. Median: 52,000 miles.

Complaints by year filed

Trend: rising. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% higher than in the 3 years before.

20012820032005200820122023
Complaints by year the complaint was filed with NHTSA. Red bars: the last 3 full calendar years used for the trend. The current year (2026) is partial.

Crash test ratings

NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.

VersionOverallFrontalSideSide poleRollover
Camaro · coupe not rated4 / 5———

Ratings before the 2011 model year come from an older, less demanding test and are not comparable with ratings for 2011 and later.

Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.

Fuel economy and running cost

EPA ratings for each 2000 Chevrolet Camaro version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).

VersionEngineTransmissionCityHwyComb.Fuel / yr
Camaro RWD3.8L 6-cyl5-speed manual172821$3,200
Camaro RWD3.8L 6-cyl4-speed automatic172620$3,350
Camaro RWD5.7L 8-cyl6-speed manual162519$4,350
Camaro RWD5.7L 8-cyl4-speed automatic152318$4,550

Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.

Recalls and investigations

NHTSA lists no recall campaigns for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro in the data used here. A recall can apply to some vehicles of a model year and not others, so check a specific vehicle by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

Technical service bulletins

TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 238 on record; the latest 10 are shown.

See all 238 bulletins →

Other model years of the Chevrolet Camaro

YearComplaintsMedian miRecallsCrash ★MPGScore (50 = typical)Trend
202316—0520—Too new
20221423,0001520—Not enough data
20212049,3304520—Stable
20203221,00035208 · FewerRising
20195312,47515200 · FewerRising
20188121,000252025 · FewerRising
201719021,655352066 · MoreStable
201614120,3151—2237 · TypicalStable
201520638,000151929 · FewerFalling
201418837,400351952 · TypicalFalling
201318740,000351950 · TypicalFalling
201211334,000451955 · TypicalFalling
201119440,0002—2050 · TypicalStable
201029548,0002—2166 · MoreFalling
20026820,0001—21Not compared (before 2008)Falling
20014843,0000—21Not compared (before 2008)Stable
20007652,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Rising
19999057,0001—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
199817343,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19976963,4921—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
199611658,0750—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
1995216104,0421—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
1994144130,5001—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19933297,0000—20Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19928896,0842—18Not compared (before 2008)Falling
19918694,2504—18Not compared (before 2008)Falling
199025160,0002—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
198925119,0003—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19881776,0002—18—Stable
19872875,0001—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19863299,9604—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19854650,0003—18Not compared (before 2008)Stable
19843999,0005—19Not compared (before 2008)Stable
198316172,5003———Stable
19796245,1362———Not enough data

All Chevrolet Camaro model years · Best and worst years by complaints

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems with the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro?

Owners of this model year report a wide spread of problems rather than one dominant failure. The issues reported most often: Warped brake rotors and pedal/steering shudder; Stalling, erratic idle and hard hot restarts; Security system blocks cranking; lights flicker.

How many NHTSA complaints does the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro have?

NHTSA recorded 76 consumer complaints for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro as of Oct 28, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

What part of the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is reported most often?

Transmission and drivetrain is named most often, in 16 complaints (21% of the total), followed by brakes with 15.

Has the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro been recalled?

NHTSA lists no recall campaigns for this model year in the data used here. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

What gas mileage does the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro get?

The EPA rates the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (Camaro, 3.8L 6-cyl) at 20 mpg combined, 17 city and 26 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,350 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.

At what mileage are problems with the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro reported?

Among the 21 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 52,000 miles and the middle half falls between 31,000 and 93,000 miles; 43% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 28, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).

Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.