Skip to content
BrakesPart report

1992 Ford Aerostar Brakes Problems

Complaints
58about this part
Share
18%of 317 total for the year
Median mileage
68,000miles
Trend
StableComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are within 25% of the 3 years before.

NHTSA recorded 58 complaints about the brakes of the 1992 Ford Aerostar, 18% of the 317 complaints for this model year. Where a mileage was given, the median is 68,000 miles. 11 of these say a crash was involved and 2 a fire, according to the filers.

Example complaints

Selected from NHTSA records; personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

“Owner was going at approximately 45 MPH. Owner applied the brakes and the brakes went to the floor. Owner says that the front right brake hose line popped right off. Causing the vehicle to lose all brake pressure preventing the vehicle from stopping. Provide further details.”

NHTSA complaint #10108595, filed 2005-01, 68,000 miles

“On friday, january 5, 2001, I was coming home on the 101 freeway when suddenly a truck cut in front of me. All I could do was slam on my brakes and I could feel something was pulling the car back, when I pushed the gas pedal the car had a hard time accelerating. This really scared me because I was on the 101 and 23 intersection. I had no way of pulling to the side of the road. I could smell something was burning really bad because I had to roll down my windows. I looked at the dash board and everything was normal. …”

NHTSA complaint #739897, filed 2001-01

“Right side front connector to brake flexible line broke off. Dealer said left side was ready to go and both were replaced. The major problem I see was that I had no braking save for the emergency brake. The rear brakes failed also and independent mechanics have told me that I should have only lost the front brakes due to the redundant brake cylinder system. However, the Ford service manager said this was normal if you lost one line. If that's the case, this is a severe safety hazard that should be addressed. I contacted Ford motor co. For technical advice and to report a possible flaw. …”

NHTSA complaint #731127, filed 2000-09

“In the last year both of the front brake lines have ruptured, leaving us with no brakes. The ruptures occurred at low speeds ar when putting the van into drive. Only this prevented us from the potential of serious injury. Ford tells me that there has been on recall on this and I am left wondering if this will continue to occur. Mechanics that fixd the car both said this was a Ford defect because they have never seen this type of failure before and this was abnormal. My wife will no longer drive the car.....what recourse do we have and is this a problem with these vehicles?”

NHTSA complaint #706583, filed 1999-05

“When driving and trying to use the turning signal it doesn't work and the back up lamp isn't working either. Also, heater malfunctioned, and the red brake light and the yellow anti- brake light stays on. Consumer had just brought the vehicle back from repair shop for a recall service, and the consumer is having all of types of problems with vehicle.”

NHTSA complaint #837064, filed 1999-04

Brakes: other model years

YearComplaintsShare of year
2000117%
1997711%
19961817%
19951610%
19942510%
19935916%
19925818%
19913415%
19902714%
1989208%
198895%
198744%
198612%

Other parts of the 1992 Ford Aerostar

Transmission and drivetrain
75 complaints
Electrical system
64 complaints
Air bags
31 complaints
Engine cooling
26 complaints
Exterior lighting
21 complaints
Equipment
18 complaints
Steering
14 complaints
Vehicle speed control
12 complaints
Body and structure
11 complaints
Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors)
11 complaints
Fuel system
10 complaints
Tires
10 complaints

← All problems reported for the 1992 Ford Aerostar

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Nov 1, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

To check a specific vehicle for open recalls, use its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. Methodology