Skip to content
TiresPart report

2007 Mercury Grand Marquis Tires Problems

Complaints
23about this part
Share
24%of 96 total for the year
Median mileage
15,750miles
Trend
StableComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are within 25% of the 3 years before.

NHTSA recorded 23 complaints about the tires of the 2007 Mercury Grand Marquis, 24% of the 96 complaints for this model year. Where a mileage was given, the median is 15,750 miles.

Example complaints

Selected from NHTSA records; personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

“On may 28, 2007, the passenger side rear tire went flat on my 2007 Mercury marquis, the tire repair shop said the valve stem was bad. On june 8, 2008 the driver side rear tire went flat and it was also a bad valve stem. The car was bought used with app. 16,000 miles and I am sure the tires are the original from the factory. As a precaution I replaced the two remaining valve stems.”

NHTSA complaint #10232403, filed 2008-06, 20,000 miles

“I have had two flat tires, one front and one rear. Both happened while the vehicle was parked. Once in my garage and the other in the parking lot of home depot. Both about a year apart. Both tires were inspected by my mechanic and both tires he had to replace the valve stems as they failed. I am glad it happened while the vehicle was parked. I notified ford motor co. Of my problems with the tires and received no satisfaction. The vehicle now has 35000 miles on the michelin tires and I can't wait to change tires and valve stems. …”

NHTSA complaint #10502171, filed 2013-03, 30,000 miles

“My wife was driving my car to pick up daughter from school. Tire blew and is unusable. I checked the tire itself and could not visually find and nail or other cause of puncture. Checked stem and found obvious crack.”

NHTSA complaint #10246621, filed 2008-10, 14,800 miles

“I bought a 2007 Mercury Grand Marquis program car in sept 2007 from a ford dealer. When I bought it it had 10,000 miles on the odometer and the original tires which were in great shape. Within the first 2 months of ownership two dill valve stems failed, in each case creating a dangerous driving situation and in each case costing me approximately $200 to replace the associated tire. After the second failure I had the remaining 2 valve stems replaced and they too showed signs of cracking. I feel dill owes me $400.”

NHTSA complaint #10265277, filed 2009-04, 12,000 miles

“In april, the left front tire on my Mercury Grand Marquis went suddenly flat at high speed on an interstate. The problem was a separation of the valve stem. Dealer replaced valve stem and tire under warranty. In october, my right front time went suddenly flat, again at high speed on an interstate. Problem was again separation of the valve stem. My subsequent inspection disclosed that both rear valve stems were cracked and about to separate as well. Dealer replaced 3 valve stems and tire under warranty. …”

NHTSA complaint #10244697, filed 2008-10, 5,945 miles

Tires: other model years

YearComplaintsShare of year
2011111%
200928%
20072324%
200611%
200582%
200451%
200310%
200279%
200143%
200074%
1999127%
199875%
199741%
199631%
199532%
199443%
199343%
199231%
199111%
199012%
198935%
198845%
198712%
198615%
198515%

Other parts of the 2007 Mercury Grand Marquis

Body and structure
18 complaints
Vehicle speed control
13 complaints
Steering
9 complaints
Air bags
6 complaints
Brakes
6 complaints
Exterior lighting
5 complaints
Fuel system
5 complaints
Transmission and drivetrain
5 complaints
Engine
4 complaints
Engine cooling
3 complaints
Seat belts
3 complaints
Wheels
3 complaints

← All problems reported for the 2007 Mercury Grand Marquis

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 31, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

To check a specific vehicle for open recalls, use its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. Methodology