1997 Nissan Maxima Air bags Problems

“While driving our vehicle on the interstate, my son rear-ended a ford winstar van. He believes that he was going approximately 60 MPH and was able to brake to some extent before hitting her rear bumper. Fortunately no one was injured. However there was extensive damage to the front of the Maxima. This included the front bumper, grill, radiator, hood and other components that I was unable to assess. However our body shop and insurance company felt that the cost of repairs exceeded the value of the vehichle such that they totaled the car. …”

“With extensive front-end damage the air bags did not deploy. While driving our vehicle on the interstate, my son rear-ended a ford winstar van. He believes that he was going approximately 60 MPH and was able to brake to some extent before hitting her rear bumper. Fortunately no one was injured. However there was extensive damage to the front of the Maxima. This included the front bumper, grill, radiator, hood and other components that I was unable to assess. …”

“Vehicle stopped in traffic. I was hit in the rear by a 2000 ford f150 truck. I was propelled forward, then back into the seat, the seat back collapsed. I sustained neck, shoulder, back, hip and knee injuries. My car was pushed into another car in front of me. The airbags in my car did not deploy!”

“I was at a complete stop at the intersection federal and 33rd street and when proceeded to turn right very slowly, approximately 02 -05 miles p/h both of front air bags infalted on me. My neck has been hurting since. There was no collision. I did not hit anything. There is no damadge to vehicle. At this point I reported top Nissan corporation they send an investigator and after three days of inspection they said they will notify me in 4 to 6 weeks. The vehicle is covered under extended wareenty. At this point they refuse to repair my vehicle.”

“On two occasions the air bag light was flashing for no apparent reason, the dealer clearded the memory and reset the system, the problem reoccured and the dealer performed the same repair except this time the consumer was charged, the consumer believes this safety issue should had been covered by the warranty. Nlm”