Skip to content
Fuel systemPart report

1996 Chrysler Concorde Fuel system Problems

Complaints
14about this part
Share
9%of 161 total for the year
Median mileage
110,000miles
Trend
Not enough dataFewer than 15 complaints, too few for a reliable trend.

NHTSA recorded 14 complaints about the fuel system of the 1996 Chrysler Concorde, 9% of the 161 complaints for this model year. Where a mileage was given, the median is 110,000 miles. 1 a fire, according to the filers. 1 recall campaign on record is filed under a similar system.

Fewer than 15 complaints name this part, so treat the figures as a rough indication only.

Example complaints

Selected from NHTSA records; personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

“Strong smell of gasoline coming from the engine compartment on my 1996 Chrysler Concorde lxi 3.5l VIN f. This car was bought used in september 2010 and the odor has become much stronger in the past 3 months. I am fearing a fire may occur. Gas mileage has greatly decreased to about 12-15 MPH.”

NHTSA complaint #10409143, filed 2011-06, 157,600 miles

“We smelled gas from the engine area. Upon further inspection noted a leak in the fuel injection system . Gas was dripping every 1 second near the o ring by the outlet fuel rail. Help!. This vehicle is not a 3.5l engine but a 3.3l 1996 Chrysler Concorde. I know the 3.5l had a recall on this did the 3.3l have one also and noone notice????? Also when you put the floor shifter into gear I.e. Drive, the vehicle does not move forward, or if in reverse that either. Then it jerks into gear almost like the shifter or leavers are not working. …”

NHTSA complaint #10380885, filed 2011-02, 143,000 miles

“Leaking fuel injector on my 1996 Chrysler Concorde. I believe that this was a recall item that was not repaired properly. This ia a low mileage auto which is driven by a senior citizen.”

NHTSA complaint #10171927, filed 2006-10, 69,715 miles

“On 03/21/2007 I was coming from work and smelled gasoline, on having my vehicle checked by a local mechanic, it was discovered that the fuel rail and the fuel line had become disengaged. As I had the fuel rail changed under a recall order back in 11/2007, I contacted the dealer that had completed the work back then. I was advised that if it was their fault the repairs would be made at no charge. If not I would be charged $75 per hr. It was agreed that the dealer would pick up the vehicle on 03/22/2007. As of 03/25/3007 my vehicle had still not been picked up. …”

NHTSA complaint #10186149, filed 2007-03, 200,000 miles

“Steering rack replacement in 1996 Chrysler Concorde is very costly and problematic. Had I known about such an inherent bad design I would never have purchased this vehicle, let alone any Chrysler product. My particular unit has failed at the low mileage of 110,000 and became dangerously close to failure! Furthermore, during the repair process many other components had to be replaced due to the required tear down to access the failed steering rack components. In addition to the steering rack failure, the fuel rail gaskets also failed in leakage at the same time.”

NHTSA complaint #10007880, filed 2003-02, 110,000 miles

Related recalls

Fuel system: other model years

YearComplaintsShare of year
2004410%
200314%
200223%
200031%
199952%
199811%
19971713%
1996149%
19952612%
19944814%
19938327%

Other parts of the 1996 Chrysler Concorde

Steering
61 complaints
Engine cooling
26 complaints
Brakes
19 complaints
Transmission and drivetrain
15 complaints
Suspension
14 complaints
Electrical system
12 complaints
Air bags
9 complaints
Equipment
9 complaints
Body and structure
6 complaints
Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors)
6 complaints
Exterior lighting
4 complaints
Other or unknown
3 complaints

← All problems reported for the 1996 Chrysler Concorde

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

To check a specific vehicle for open recalls, use its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. Methodology