Skip to content
ChryslerModel report

Chrysler Crossfire Convertible Problems by Model Year

NHTSA recorded 124 consumer complaints across the 1 model years of the Chrysler Crossfire Convertible (2005–2005) that have at least 5 complaints. 2005 has the most, with 124. Across all years, the part named most often is visibility (67 mentions). Pick a model year below to see its parts, mileage, recalls and service bulletins.

All Crossfire Convertible model years

Years with fewer than 5 complaints are not listed. The score compares years of the same model, allowing for the era and for how long each year has collected complaints: 50 is a typical year, lower means fewer complaints. It is not adjusted for sales volume.

YearComplaintsMedian miRecallsTSBsScore (50 = typical)Trend
200512448,000034Not compared (before 2008)Stable

Parts named most often, all years

Counts add up complaint mentions across the listed years. A complaint can name several parts.

Example complaints

One per model year, chosen for length and detail. Personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

2005: “The Chrysler crossfire has a problem with the ignition switch locking up whereiin you can not get the key to turn the ignition. This problem has affected a lot of owners who have had to spend thousands of dollars to to have the switch replaced. This should be a recall item. I had to have a mechanic come to my home to replace the switch as I could not get the key to turn and startthe vehicle.”

NHTSA complaint #11089229, filed 2018-04, 122,000 miles

Other Chrysler models

Chrysler Town And Country
13,510 complaints
Chrysler Pacifica
7,052 complaints
Chrysler 300
4,925 complaints
Chrysler 200
4,188 complaints
Chrysler Sebring
2,830 complaints
Chrysler PT Cruiser
2,524 complaints
Chrysler Concorde
2,217 complaints
Chrysler 300C
1,254 complaints

All Chrysler models →

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 27, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Methodology