Skip to content
SuspensionPart report

1995 Ford Taurus Suspension Problems

Complaints
69about this part
Share
6%of 1,205 total for the year
Median mileage
90,250miles
Trend
StableComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are within 25% of the 3 years before.

NHTSA recorded 69 complaints about the suspension of the 1995 Ford Taurus, 6% of the 1,205 complaints for this model year. Where a mileage was given, the median is 90,250 miles. 1 of these say a crash was involved, according to the filers.

Example complaints

Selected from NHTSA records; personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.

“This past sunday, on june 11, 2017 I was driving home from a graduation party and there was a loud pow once I accelerated from a stop. My steering was very stiff (as if I was driving an ancient large truck with no power steering, also my exhaust system at least partially came undun. I was able to get the crippled car to our regular repair shop, who told me that I had a subframe rust-collapse. I had talked to a shadetree mechanic friend, who said that it wasn't an actual subframe collapse, but the next layer up, the engine cradle whose sleeves are no thicker steel than the unibody sheetmetal. …”

NHTSA complaint #10995826, filed 2017-06, 136,000 miles

“Had been driving auto and when entering parking area I heard a load bang and the front end of the vehicle started to wobble. I stopped, got out and looked at the front of the car. The front driver's side tire was flat and upon further investigation, I found that the driver's side front spring had broken and punctured the front driver's side tire. At this time, nothing has been done to repair damage other than putting on temporary spare tire to park the vehicle.”

NHTSA complaint #10136574, filed 2005-09, 91,000 miles

“I have a 1995 Ford Taurus , last year the rear coil spring broke while driving and made the car seem like it hit something . I did not lose control but it did make the ccar swerve . This was either through my action or the action of the coil spring breaking. About 2 weeks ago I was driving and the drivers front coil spring broke , this made the car suddendly pull to the left . I tell myself I was lucky I was not travelling at a higher speed. I did not have an accident but it pulled the car enough I went into the opposite lane. …”

NHTSA complaint #10081304, filed 2004-07, 99,375 miles

“The vehicle's front springs failed after new tires were installed on the front two wheels. Both springs snapped in half and had to be replaced. This was noticed before I drove at a high rate of speed, however the potential for an accident is very high considering the number of these cars on the road.”

NHTSA complaint #10272787, filed 2009-06, 44,783 miles

“I was driving along when all of a sudden a big bang car slammed pavement began to swerve. Started smoking off burned rubber tire popped an car was broke down wheel dangling.”

NHTSA complaint #10573609, filed 2014-03, 184,568 miles

Suspension: other model years

YearComplaintsShare of year
201916%
2018713%
201737%
201656%
2015114%
201483%
2013254%
201163%
201031%
200923%
2008106%
200743%
200631%
200571%
2004103%
200331326%
200296267%
200151550%
200044337%
199918021%
19985911%
1997284%
1996607%
1995696%
1994445%
199316411%
1992487%
1991274%
1990185%
1989153%
1988103%
1987114%
198677%

Other parts of the 1995 Ford Taurus

Transmission and drivetrain
394 complaints
Engine cooling
352 complaints
Electrical system
95 complaints
Brakes
86 complaints
Vehicle speed control
85 complaints
Air bags
55 complaints
Body and structure
55 complaints
Fuel system
53 complaints
Steering
39 complaints
Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors)
38 complaints
Other or unknown
35 complaints
Exterior lighting
25 complaints

← All problems reported for the 1995 Ford Taurus

About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 27, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.

To check a specific vehicle for open recalls, use its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. Methodology