Keystone Everest Problems by Model Year
NHTSA recorded 8 consumer complaints across the 1 model years of the Keystone Everest (2007–2007) that have at least 5 complaints. 2007 has the most, with 8. Across all years, the part named most often is body and structure (3 mentions). Pick a model year below to see its parts, mileage, recalls and service bulletins.
All Everest model years
Years with fewer than 5 complaints are not listed. The score compares years of the same model, allowing for the era and for how long each year has collected complaints: 50 is a typical year, lower means fewer complaints. It is not adjusted for sales volume.
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | TSBs | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 7,000 | 4 | 0 | — | Not enough data |
Parts named most often, all years
Counts add up complaint mentions across the listed years. A complaint can name several parts.
- Body and structure3 38%
- Tires2 25%
- Suspension2 25%
- Equipment1 13%
Example complaints
One per model year, chosen for length and detail. Personal details are removed. They are consumer reports, not findings.
2007: “I own a 2007 Keystone Everest fiver. The tires on it are the mission's 235-80-16 load range. I've had two blowouts,the first wasn't that bad but the second one did some damage on the side of the camper. I contacted the tire manufacturer and was told that because the tires were five years old that they couldn't or should I say wouldn't do anything about it. I explained to them that I purchased the unit new off the lot in 2007. …”
NHTSA complaint #10413373, filed 2011-07, 3,000 milesOther Keystone models
127 complaintsKeystone Cougar
118 complaintsKeystone Raptor
35 complaintsKeystone Alpine
28 complaintsKeystone Sprinter
27 complaintsKeystone Keystone
23 complaintsKeystone Outback
13 complaintsKeystone Zeppelin
12 complaints
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 27, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Methodology