2002 Toyota Tundra Problems
- Complaints
- 482filed with NHTSA
- Median mileage
- 91,100miles, 370 complaints with mileage
- Recalls
- 3campaigns on record
- Trend
- FallingComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
- NHTSA crash rating
- —overall rating starts with 2011 models
- EPA fuel economy
- 16 mpgcombined, 3.4L 6-cyl RWD · 15 city / 18 hwy
Sources: NHTSA records for the 2002 Toyota Tundra (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error
What owners report
Owners of the 2002 Tundra most often describe frame and underbody corrosion, which frequently shows up as perforated frame sections, rusted spare-tire carriers and corroded rear axle housings, and many of these reports are filed well past 100,000 miles. A second, earlier pattern involves front-brake pulsation and vibration that appears within a few thousand miles of rotor work and tends to recur. Front lower ball joint separation and steering-rack corrosion also appear repeatedly in the sample, mostly at moderate to high mileage.
- Body and structure
Frame and underbody rust-through
- 168 complaints (35%)
- median 129,717 mi at 13.5 yrs old (136 state mileage)
- 3 mention a crash, fire or injury
- owner-quoted repair $4,750 (median of 8 quotes)
- filed 2003–2026
Owners describe holes and perforations in the frame, subframe, rear crossmembers and bed supports, often found during routine service or a state inspection rather than while driving. Complaints say dealers sometimes applied undercoating or rust inhibitor under a corrosion campaign, and some owners report that the coating later flaked and corrosion continued, while others were told the damage did not qualify for repair. Several reports mention related corrosion of the spare-tire carrier or fuel-tank mounting, and some say the vehicle was judged unsuitable to drive by the dealer or an independent shop. Reported mostly between roughly 75,000 and 250,000 miles, with many filings from vehicles registered or used in states with road salt.
What to check: Inspect the frame rails, crossmembers, rear axle housing and spare-tire lift plate for flaking coating or holes, and ask for documentation of any frame corrosion inspection or undercoating work.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“Rear frame crossmember rusted through and holes in front frame. In 2011 there was a safety recall on this. Feb,15, 2011 I brought the truck to the Toyota dealer where I bought it. They inspected the frame and sprayed undercoating on it. It was not a sufficient fix. Toyota refuses to fix this problem.”
NHTSA complaint #10954109, filed 2017-02, 106,800 miles“I found portions of the frame rusted thru and could not mount step bars. I mentioned this earlier in a report. I also just found my spare tire missing and found the bracket holding it had rusted and the tire was lost while driving. When and where is unknown. Toyota examined the truck 2 years ago for a recall for rust issues and said everything was ok.the tire loss is irritating and dangerous to other drivers.”
NHTSA complaint #10778677, filed 2015-09, 99,600 miles - Brakes
Front brake pulsation and vibration
- 82 complaints (17%)
- median 29,017 mi at 3.7 yrs old (64 state mileage)
- 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
- owner-quoted repair $1,401 (median of 8 quotes)
- filed 2002–2024
Owners describe shaking or pulsation through the steering wheel and front end when braking, sometimes severe enough that they brake early to keep the truck settled. Complaints frequently mention warped or out-of-round front rotors and rear drums, with resurfacing or replacement restoring smooth braking only for a short period before the vibration returned. Several reports say dealers declined further work once the vehicle was past warranty, and one describes a sticking front caliper that kept a pad in contact with the rotor. Often reported under about 60,000 miles, sometimes within a few thousand miles of rotor or drum service.
What to check: Test-brake from highway speed and feel for shake through the wheel, then check rotor and drum condition and whether calipers are free; service bulletins describe a groan or squeak with certain replacement pads.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“2002 Toyota Tundra 43,000 miles has a severe vibration when braking at any speed, steering wheel shakes side to side and I feel like I'm going to lose control of the vehicle. Dealer (rockland Toyota) acknowledges the problems and will not pay for repair since I'm past the warranty period of 36,000 miles.”
NHTSA complaint #10039126, filed 2003-09, 35,000 miles“Brakes began shaking about two months after I first bought the truck. I went on an extended road trip and at one point, when going down a grade, my brakes began to shake so violently that I thought I might lose control. I had to pull of the road and inspect my brakes! When I returned from my trip, I replaced the pads and turned the rotors. This was about 2 months ago, and I am beginning to experience the same problem.”
NHTSA complaint #10043529, filed 2003-10, 25,000 miles - Suspension
Lower ball joint separation
- 55 complaints (11%)
- median 110,500 mi at 8.7 yrs old (48 state mileage)
- 7 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2002–2023
Complaints describe the front lower ball joint coming apart from the knuckle, which lets the wheel fold under or detach and leaves the driver unable to steer. Reports include failures during low-speed turns in parking lots as well as at highway speed, and some owners say the joint had already been replaced under a prior campaign before failing again. Several owners link their experience to the ball joint recall campaign and ask about reimbursement, and one report notes a leaking steering rack found at the same inspection. Reported from roughly 50,000 to over 200,000 miles, including joints replaced earlier in the vehicle's life.
What to check: Ask whether the front lower ball joints were replaced under the ball joint campaign and when, then have a shop check both joints for play and look for uneven front tire wear.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“In november of 2003 I was making a right hand turn when the ball joint on the driver side gave way causing the wheel to fold under the truck. In september of 2004 a similar incident occurred with the passenger side. This truck is well cared for and there were no obvious signs of a problem prior to failure. Both sides have been repaired at my expense because the truck was past warranty. Total damage was about $3,000.00 ea04024_cat. …”
NHTSA complaint #10095760, filed 2005-08, 58,000 miles“I was driving down interstate 5 on my way to work at 70mph and as I was on the causeway the lower ball joint came off causing my front tire to come off and it resulted in a crash that totalled my truck and damage to me as well .”
NHTSA complaint #11006273, filed 2017-07, 220,000 miles - Steering
Steering rack leaks and corrosion
- 46 complaints (10%)
- median 116,627 mi at 10.1 yrs old (42 state mileage)
- 2 mention a crash, fire or injury
- owner-quoted repair $1,600 (median of 9 quotes)
- filed 2003–2022
Owners describe power steering fluid leaks, a cracked or fractured rack, and in some cases a sudden loss of power assist while turning. Complaints attribute the damage to corrosion of the rack housing and its fittings, with one report of a connection separating and fluid pouring out. Others mention noise or knocking when turning and tie rods loose enough to need replacement; repairs were handled by dealers, independent shops or not at all. Mostly reported between about 60,000 and 150,000 miles, with some later filings.
What to check: Check the steering rack and its lines for wetness or rust, listen for knocking while turning at low speed, and confirm the fluid level and tie-rod play.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“I was pulling out of my driveway and experienced a sudden and complete loss of power steering and was unable to complete the turn, stopping in the middle of the road. One of the connections on the power steering rack had completely separated due to rust and the power steering fluid was pouring out. If I had been going at higher speeds (such as driving on a highway or taking an off ramp) it would have been extremely dangerous as it would have been hard to impossible to maintain control. …”
NHTSA complaint #10552852, filed 2013-11, 64,238 miles“I was driving down a very steep graded and winding gravel road that required consistent braking and as I was making a turn to negotiate a right turn on a curve, my steering all of a sudden failed to exist. The steering wheel seriously resisted my turning it. I was forced to apply the brakes quickly to attempt going over the side of the road and down a deeply sloped ravine of about 20 feet or so. The truck stopped with the front wheels just over the edge but did stop before going over . …”
NHTSA complaint #10521977, filed 2013-06, 129,647 miles - Transmission and drivetrain
Rusted rear axle housing oil leak
- 29 complaints (6%)
- median 100,000 mi at 9.6 yrs old (26 state mileage)
- 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2005–2021
Owners report gear oil leaking from the rear axle or differential housing through rusted-through metal rather than through the seals, sometimes leaving oil on the spare tire, bumper or roadway. Complaints describe replacement of the whole axle or housing at the owner's expense, and some owners connect the corrosion to the same frame and underbody rust described in other reports. One report notes the axle welds failing because of rust. Reported from about 47,000 to 186,000 miles on vehicles with visible underbody corrosion.
What to check: Look under the rear of the truck for oil misting or drips on the axle, spare tire and bumper, and check the housing surface for pitting or perforation.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“I am the owner of two Toyota vehicles. Vehicle one is a 1992 Toyota pickup extended cab 4x4 3.0 v6 with 220,000 miles on it I bought it with 124,000 miles on it. Vehicle two is a 2002 Toyota Tundra sr5 4.7 v8 with 47,000 miles I bought it with 39,000 miles on it with only one previous owner. The new frame is installed on the truck but I have noticed now that my rear axle housing is completely rotted and rusted out and leaking all over the place. The structure of this is not safe and I travel an average 6,000 miles a month for work. …”
NHTSA complaint #10454785, filed 2012-04, 47,000 miles“The rear axel and differential housing/casting is corroded thru such that oil is leaking through the differential hub onto the roadway and resulting in a loss of gear oil within the differential and axels. After driving on the highway this oil was observed on the spare tire (mounted under the bed) and up the back of the bumper. The service representative at one dealership I approached to discuss the cost of repair indicated that they have seen the problem multiple times. …”
NHTSA complaint #11309429, filed 2020-02, 186,700 miles
Buying note. Corrosion is the main thing to verify on this model year: a pre-purchase inspection on a lift should cover the frame, crossmembers, rear axle and spare-tire carrier, along with records of any corrosion campaign work. Also budget for brake and front suspension checks, since rotor work and ball joint replacement show up repeatedly in owner reports.
Summary written with AI from a sample of 60 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.
NHTSA recorded 482 consumer complaints for the 2002 Toyota Tundra. 370 of the complaints include a mileage, and 26% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 91,100 miles. Of all complaints, 30 involved a crash, 1 a fire, 20 an injury, 3 a death, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns and 104 technical service bulletins for this model year.
Not compared (before 2008). Model years 2008–2023 of the same vehicle that have at least 25 complaints are compared, and a model needs at least 3 of them.
Which parts are reported most
Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.
- Body and structure154 32%
- Brakes117 24%
- Suspension81 17%
- Steering38 7.9%
- Other or unknown30 6.2%
- Fuel system22 4.6%
- Air bags21 4.4%
- Vehicle speed control14 2.9%
- Tires13 2.7%
Also reported: Wheels (11), Electrical system (9), Engine cooling (7), Exterior lighting (7), Seat belts (7), Engine (4), Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors) (4), Equipment (3), Latches, locks and linkages (3), Electronic stability control (1), Interior lighting (1), Seats (1).
Example complaints
Body and structure: “The chassis of the truck is very damaged by rust, in some parts it even has holes, so I do not know if it is very safe to handle it. I bought it at a car dealer a few weeks ago, I thought it was just a bit of rust ... But when I checked it out better I now find that the rust really harms the structure, another problem ... It gives off a strong smell of gasoline. ..”
NHTSA complaint #11221293, filed 2019-06, 174,000 milesBrakes: “Upper ball joints, rear springs, brakes front & back, and manual transmission, and o2 sensors too! This is what I have been repairing and was not aware of all of the recalls on my truck! So far I have just repairing it until today, after hearing about the newest recall! I will be calling my dealer monday....”
NHTSA complaint #10291338, filed 2009-11, 119,000 milesSuspension: “Frist time comeing down my road going 30 miles per hr l right upper and lower ball joint broke tire went under the truck. Second time the left upper and lower ball joint broke turning a corner. Third time it happen I just got off of the hwy and the lower ball joint broke. I am afied to drive it .”
NHTSA complaint #10929389, filed 2016-12, 149,000 milesTransmission and drivetrain: “When attempting to put the truck in gear to leave a gas station the entire shifter mechanism broke off at the mount within the steering column. After 1 google search it shows this is very common with my Tundra truck (many postings and complaints-issues). I was in a pickle to move my vehicle and was not safe in doing so.”
NHTSA complaint #10610869, filed 2014-07, 155,000 milesMileage when problems were reported
26% of the 370 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 47,000 and 138,000 miles.
Complaints by year filed
Trend: falling. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
Crash test ratings
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 2002 Toyota Tundra. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.
| Version | Overall | Frontal | Side | Side pole | Rollover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra · extended cab | not rated | 4 / 4 | — | — | — |
Ratings before the 2011 model year come from an older, less demanding test and are not comparable with ratings for 2011 and later.
Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.
Fuel economy and running cost
EPA ratings for each 2002 Toyota Tundra version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).
| Version | Engine | Transmission | City | Hwy | Comb. | Fuel / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra 2WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 2WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 5-speed manual | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 2WD | 4.7L 8-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 13 | 17 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 14 | 16 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 5-speed manual | 14 | 16 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 4.7L 8-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 13 | 16 | 14 | $4,800 |
Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.
Recalls and investigations
- 09V444000Nov 18, 2009Structure › Frame and members › Underbody shieldsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2000–2003
Toyota is recalling model year 2000-2003 tundra vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the following states: connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, new hampshire, new jersey…
- 05V225000May 17, 2005Suspension › Front › Control arm › Lower ball jointCovers: Toyota Tundra 2002–2004, Tacoma 2001–2004, Sequoia 2002–2004 +1 more
On certain sport utility vehicles, due to a manufacturing issue in the front suspension lower ball joint, there is a possibility that the surface of the ball of the joint may have been scratched. The ball joint may eventually experience excessive wear and…
- 02V129000May 1, 2002WheelsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2000–2002, Sequoia 2001–2002
On certain 4x2 vehicles equipped with an alloy wheel tire upgrade (options wm4, wm8, zl1-zl4, dh4, or dh5) installed by the processing centers in jacksonville, florida or commerce, georgia, a label identifying the spare tire as a temporary use spare tire was…
Recall details for the 2002 Toyota Tundra → · Check a VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls
NHTSA investigations
- PE09049Frame corrosionClosed · Oct 6, 2009
- EA04024Ball joint separationClosed · Aug 20, 2004
- PE04040Front suspension ball joint breakageClosed · Apr 13, 2004
Technical service bulletins
TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 104 on record; the latest 10 are shown.
- 11012744Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11012743Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11012742Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11012735Dec 5, 2024Body and structure. Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail…
- 11012727Dec 3, 2024Body and structure. Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type…
- 11007445Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11007444Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11007443Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11006151Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11006150Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
Other model years of the Toyota Tundra
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | Crash ★ | MPG | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36 | 6,000 | 1 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2025 | 141 | 4,605 | 5 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2024 | 350 | 15,000 | 10 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2023 | 412 | 30,000 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Too new |
| 2022 | 432 | 28,500 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Rising |
| 2021 | 24 | 18,000 | 2 | 4 | 15 | — | Rising |
| 2020 | 47 | 3,000 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 50 · Typical | Falling |
| 2019 | 74 | 17,256 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 59 · Typical | Stable |
| 2018 | 100 | 7,900 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 69 · More | Stable |
| 2017 | 78 | 16,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 42 · Typical | Stable |
| 2016 | 120 | 15,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 75 · More | Stable |
| 2015 | 51 | 57,000 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 5 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2014 | 93 | 40,000 | 4 | 3–4 | 17 | 32 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2013 | 85 | 53,250 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 27 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2012 | 156 | 78,893 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 31 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2011 | 134 | 69,500 | 10 | 4 | 17 | 44 · Typical | Falling |
| 2010 | 163 | 41,630 | 15 | — | 16 | 79 · More | Falling |
| 2009 | 38 | 60,000 | 12 | — | 16 | 26 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2008 | 327 | 42,396 | 12 | — | 16 | 100 · More | Falling |
| 2007 | 390 | 48,210 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2006 | 545 | 96,000 | 10 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2005 | 377 | 82,225 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2004 | 466 | 102,000 | 8 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2003 | 399 | 98,564 | 7 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2002 | 482 | 91,100 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2001 | 415 | 102,000 | 2 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Stable |
| 2000 | 1,011 | 99,665 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
All Toyota Tundra model years · Best and worst years by complaints
Frequently asked questions
What are the most common problems with the 2002 Toyota Tundra?
Owners of the 2002 Tundra most often describe frame and underbody corrosion, which frequently shows up as perforated frame sections, rusted spare-tire carriers and corroded rear axle housings, and many of these reports are filed well past 100,000 miles. The issues reported most often: Frame and underbody rust-through; Front brake pulsation and vibration; Lower ball joint separation.
How many NHTSA complaints does the 2002 Toyota Tundra have?
NHTSA recorded 482 consumer complaints for the 2002 Toyota Tundra as of Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.
What part of the 2002 Toyota Tundra is reported most often?
Body and structure is named most often, in 154 complaints (32% of the total), followed by brakes with 117.
Has the 2002 Toyota Tundra been recalled?
NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns for this model year. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
What gas mileage does the 2002 Toyota Tundra get?
The EPA rates the 2002 Toyota Tundra (Tundra 2WD, 3.4L 6-cyl) at 16 mpg combined, 15 city and 18 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $4,200 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.
At what mileage are problems with the 2002 Toyota Tundra reported?
Among the 370 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 91,100 miles and the middle half falls between 47,000 and 138,000 miles; 26% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).
Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.