2012 Toyota Tundra Problems
Compared with other Toyota Tundra years
Fewer complaints than typical for this model
31/100 0.7× a typical year · 50 = typical
- Complaint rate is 0.7× that of a typical Toyota Tundra year, weighted for crashes, fires, injuries, recalls and mileage, and allowing for the era and for how long each year has had to collect complaints.
- 21 of its 156 complaints were filed by the end of 2014.
- Most reported problem: Secondary air injection pump/valve failure, limp mode (55 complaints, median 87,065 mi).
- 3 recall campaigns on record. A VIN search at nhtsa.gov/recalls shows open recalls for a specific vehicle.
Based only on NHTSA complaints, recalls and investigations. Not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold, and not a reliability rating. How this is calculated
- Complaints
- 156filed with NHTSA
- Median mileage
- 78,893miles, 120 complaints with mileage
- Recalls
- 3campaigns on record
- Trend
- FallingComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
- NHTSA crash rating
- 4 / 5stars overall, 6 rated versions
- EPA fuel economy
- 17 mpgcombined, 4.6L 8-cyl RWD · 15 city / 20 hwy
Sources: NHTSA records for the 2012 Toyota Tundra (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error
What owners report
Most owner complaints for this model year center on the secondary air injection system, which owners describe as sending the truck into reduced-power limp mode with the check engine and TRAC OFF lights on, often near highway speeds. Cam tower oil leaks on 5.7L trucks and power steering rack leaks are also reported, generally at moderate to higher mileage. Steering and engine complaints dominate the total counts, and owners frequently mention that similar fixes were covered on earlier model years but not this one.
- Engine
Secondary air injection pump/valve failure, limp mode
- 55 complaints (35%)
- median 87,065 mi at 7.3 yrs old (44 state mileage)
- owner-quoted repair $3,000 (median of 17 quotes)
- filed 2012–2023
Owners describe the check engine light, TRAC OFF light and sometimes a flashing 4LO indicator coming on, after which the truck drops into a reduced-power limp mode that limits speed, sometimes to 25-45 mph. Many say the dealer diagnosed the secondary air injection pump and switching valves, with repair quotes commonly in the $2,000-$2,800 range. Several complaints note that the same part was addressed through a warranty enhancement or recall on earlier model years but not on their 2012 truck, and that a repair did not always prevent the problem from returning. Some owners mention the problem appearing after rain, after refueling, or during cold starts. Most often reported between roughly 60,000 and 110,000 miles, in mixed city and highway driving.
What to check: Ask whether the secondary air injection pumps and valves have been replaced and get the repair paperwork; scan for stored codes P0418, P2432 or P2440 during a pre-purchase inspection.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“Secondary air injection pump and secondary air injection switching value causing check engine and trac control lights to come on. I was told by the dealer that the same piece and design was recalled on the 2011 but not the 2012 Tundra. It comes on and off but when it is on it feels like that there is a limp mode making it difficult to get up to speed on the highway. The steering feels different which I think is the traction control.”
NHTSA complaint #11222498, filed 2019-06, 80,000 miles“2012 Tundra 4.6 v8 my truck will go into limp mode and the 4lo light flashes, check engine, and trac off lights were all on. Almost complete lose of power will happen. In traffic I end up blocking ever vehicle behind me, because the truck will not reach the speed limit. If there is a hill then the truck barely moves going up the hill. After looking online I saw it's a pretty common problem on Toyota with the secondary air injection pump seizing. …”
NHTSA complaint #11319365, filed 2020-03, 96,000 miles - Engine
Cam tower / camshaft seal oil leak (5.7L)
- 6 complaints (4%)
- median 85,500 mi at 7.0 yrs old (4 state mileage, few)
- 1 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2017–2022
Owners of 5.7L trucks describe oil seeping from the cam tower area, in some cases dripping onto the exhaust manifold and producing a burning smell or damaging nearby wiring and sensors. Repairs are described as costly, with quotes ranging from a few hundred to several thousand dollars depending on the extent. Some report the leak was repaired under powertrain warranty while others say it was outside coverage and at their own expense. Reported from as low as 15,000 miles up through roughly 175,000 miles, with several examples under 100,000 miles.
What to check: Inspect the cam tower area and exhaust manifold on the 5.7L for oil residue or a burnt smell, and check for any service record of a cam seal or cam tower reseal.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“My 4x4 Toyota Tundra crewmax with the 5.7l engine was diagnosed with a cam tower leak with only 15,000 miles on it. Fortunately the vehicle was still under the factory power train warranty. Toyota made the repair and provided a rental car for me. I have heard this is a common problem with the 2012-2013 5.7l engine and I want this issue to be more public. I worry owners of this vehicle will be stuck with the $2,300-$3,000 bill to fix their own vehicle if their vehicle's power train warranty has expired. …”
NHTSA complaint #10959583, filed 2017-03, 15,000 miles“I bought a certified used 2012 platinum Tundra with 32k miles and 2 years later with regular maintenance and a cam seal leak fixed by the dealer, I have found a very hard rod knock from the engine. I took my truck back to the dealership to have the oil and filter changed with 114.8k miles on it at this time and was told I will need to replace the engine. I believe something isn't smelling right. Does anyone know any issues with the connection of the cam seal leak and the rod ready to blow. The dealership said it would be approx. …”
NHTSA complaint #11030165, filed 2017-09, 100,000 miles
Buying note. A pre-purchase scan for secondary air injection codes and a look at the cam tower area, steering rack boots and fuel tank valve are the most useful checks on this model year. Service records showing those repairs were already completed are worth more than low mileage alone.
Summary written with AI from a sample of 60 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.
NHTSA recorded 156 consumer complaints for the 2012 Toyota Tundra. 120 of the complaints include a mileage, and 30% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 78,893 miles. Of all complaints, 7 involved a crash, 2 a fire, 5 an injury, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns and 316 technical service bulletins for this model year. Compared with the other 14 Toyota Tundra model years that have at least 25 complaints and are old enough to compare, this one scores 31 out of 100, where 50 is a typical year for the model (fewer complaints than typical for this model). The comparison allows for the era and for how long each year has had to collect complaints, but not for how many vehicles were sold.
Which parts are reported most
Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.
- Engine57 37%
- Fuel system27 17%
- Electrical system19 12%
- Other or unknown17 11%
- Steering12 7.7%
- Body and structure11 7.0%
- Air bags9 5.8%
- Brakes7 4.5%
Also reported: Vehicle speed control (7), Wheels (6), Seats (4), Suspension (4), Engine cooling (3), Seat belts (2), Tires (2), Latches, locks and linkages (1).
Example complaints
Engine: “While driving, multiple dashboard lights came on and my truck went into limp mode, meaning I lost almost all power while driving in heavy traffic. Turns out this is an issue with the air injection pump, which is a known problem in Toyota tundras. I believe this is a safety issue that Toyota needs to address.”
NHTSA complaint #11195714, filed 2019-04, 86,900 milesFuel system: “After starting the engine, the engine raised past red line RPM for several seconds. After slowing, I started to back out drive when engine raised again into red line RPM. Before I got it pulled back into drive, it raised 3 more times. Each time I managed to get to neutral.”
NHTSA complaint #10851491, filed 2016-03, 78,000 milesTransmission and drivetrain: “While driving down the road the transmission has problems shifting into 1st and 2nd gear. The transmission is a little sluggish while shifting and in some cases even jumps while shifting into 1st and 2nd gear. Have had it looked at and was told have to replace the whole transmission. I have a coworker who had some problems with his transmission on his Tundra, and he ended up trading it in, because it could not be fixed. I have the paperwork from getting it checked if it is needed”
NHTSA complaint #11130052, filed 2018-09, 70,655 milesElectrical system: “On 4/5/16, I started my 2012 Tundra to go to work. Engine light comes and stays on. Called local dealer and took the truck in. 5 hours of diagnostic testing reveals code p0418 (secondary air intake system) issue on my 2012 Tundra. Cost of repairs, $2048.00. After some research into this code p0418, I find that it is a reoccurring problem for tundras, tacomas and sequoias dating back to 2000 - 2010. Repair costs of up to $4,000. Supposed to be resolved in 2011 + models. Not so. …”
NHTSA complaint #10854010, filed 2016-04, 87,992 milesMileage when problems were reported
30% of the 120 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 43,500 and 100,000 miles.
Complaints by year filed
Trend: falling. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
Crash test ratings
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 2012 Toyota Tundra. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.
| Version | Overall | Frontal | Side | Side pole | Rollover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra · crew cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · extended cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · regular cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · crew cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
| Tundra · extended cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
| Tundra · regular cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
Neighbouring years: 2011: same overall rating; 2013: same overall rating. A redesign between years can change both the car and the test.
Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.
Fuel economy and running cost
EPA ratings for each 2012 Toyota Tundra version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).
| Version | Engine | Transmission | City | Hwy | Comb. | Fuel / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra 2WD | 4.0L 6-cyl | 5-speed automatic | 16 | 20 | 18 | $3,700 |
| Tundra 2WD | 4.6L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,950 |
| Tundra 2WD | 5.7L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 4.6L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 14 | 19 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 4WD | 5.7L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 13 | 17 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD FFV | 5.7L 8-cyl · flex-fuel | 6-speed automatic | 13 | 18 | 15 | $4,450 |
Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.
Recalls and investigations
- 21V920000Nov 23, 2021Steering › Hydraulic power assist systemCovers: Toyota Tundra 2007–2021, Sequoia 2008–2019, 2021–2022
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2008-2022 Sequoia and 2007-2021 Tundra vehicles. The power steering gear assembly may have been manufactured incorrectly, which can result in an oil leak.
- 13V123000Apr 9, 2013Equipment › Other › LabelsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2008, 2010–2013, Tacoma 2010–2013, Highlander 2010–2013 +16 more
Southeast Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 and 2010-2013 Toyota Tundra, 2010-2012 Rav4, 2012 Toyota Sequoia, 2010-2011 Toyota Corolla, 2010-2011 Toyota Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota FJ…
- 13V014000Jan 16, 2013SeatsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2010–2013, Highlander 2009–2013, Venza 2009–2013 +13 more
Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain models interspersed through model years 2009 through 2013 as follows: model year 2009-2012 Tacoma, 4Runner, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Prius, and RAV4; model year 2009-2010 Avalon, FJ Cruiser, and…
Recall details for the 2012 Toyota Tundra → · Check a VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls
Technical service bulletins
TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 316 on record; the latest 10 are shown.
- 11028712Jan 7, 2026Other or unknown. Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11012744Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11012743Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11012742Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11012735Dec 5, 2024Body and structure. Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail…
- 11012727Dec 3, 2024Body and structure. Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type…
- 11007455Jul 29, 2024Body and structure. Some 2005 – 2024 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11006161Jul 29, 2024Body and structure. Some 2005 – 2024 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11007445Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11007444Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
Other model years of the Toyota Tundra
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | Crash ★ | MPG | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36 | 6,000 | 1 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2025 | 141 | 4,605 | 5 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2024 | 350 | 15,000 | 10 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2023 | 412 | 30,000 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Too new |
| 2022 | 432 | 28,500 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Rising |
| 2021 | 24 | 18,000 | 2 | 4 | 15 | — | Rising |
| 2020 | 47 | 3,000 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 50 · Typical | Falling |
| 2019 | 74 | 17,256 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 59 · Typical | Stable |
| 2018 | 100 | 7,900 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 69 · More | Stable |
| 2017 | 78 | 16,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 42 · Typical | Stable |
| 2016 | 120 | 15,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 75 · More | Stable |
| 2015 | 51 | 57,000 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 5 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2014 | 93 | 40,000 | 4 | 3–4 | 17 | 32 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2013 | 85 | 53,250 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 27 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2012 | 156 | 78,893 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 31 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2011 | 134 | 69,500 | 10 | 4 | 17 | 44 · Typical | Falling |
| 2010 | 163 | 41,630 | 15 | — | 16 | 79 · More | Falling |
| 2009 | 38 | 60,000 | 12 | — | 16 | 26 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2008 | 327 | 42,396 | 12 | — | 16 | 100 · More | Falling |
| 2007 | 390 | 48,210 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2006 | 545 | 96,000 | 10 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2005 | 377 | 82,225 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2004 | 466 | 102,000 | 8 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2003 | 399 | 98,564 | 7 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2002 | 482 | 91,100 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2001 | 415 | 102,000 | 2 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Stable |
| 2000 | 1,011 | 99,665 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
All Toyota Tundra model years · Best and worst years by complaints
Frequently asked questions
What are the most common problems with the 2012 Toyota Tundra?
Most owner complaints for this model year center on the secondary air injection system, which owners describe as sending the truck into reduced-power limp mode with the check engine and TRAC OFF lights on, often near highway speeds. The issues reported most often: Secondary air injection pump/valve failure, limp mode; Cam tower / camshaft seal oil leak (5.7L).
How many NHTSA complaints does the 2012 Toyota Tundra have?
NHTSA recorded 156 consumer complaints for the 2012 Toyota Tundra as of Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.
What part of the 2012 Toyota Tundra is reported most often?
Engine is named most often, in 57 complaints (37% of the total), followed by fuel system with 27.
Has the 2012 Toyota Tundra been recalled?
NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns for this model year. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
How did the 2012 Toyota Tundra do in NHTSA crash tests?
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings give the 2012 Toyota Tundra 4 out of 5 stars overall, across 6 rated versions (body style and drive). Ratings from different model years are only comparable when the vehicle was not redesigned in between.
What gas mileage does the 2012 Toyota Tundra get?
The EPA rates the 2012 Toyota Tundra (Tundra 2WD, 4.6L 8-cyl) at 17 mpg combined, 15 city and 20 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,950 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.
At what mileage are problems with the 2012 Toyota Tundra reported?
Among the 120 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 78,893 miles and the middle half falls between 43,500 and 100,000 miles; 30% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).
Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.