2000 Toyota Tundra Problems
- Complaints
- 1,011filed with NHTSA
- Median mileage
- 99,665miles, 689 complaints with mileage
- Recalls
- 3campaigns on record
- Trend
- FallingComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
- NHTSA crash rating
- —overall rating starts with 2011 models
- EPA fuel economy
- 16 mpgcombined, 3.4L 6-cyl RWD · 15 city / 18 hwy
Sources: NHTSA records for the 2000 Toyota Tundra (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error
What owners report
Owners of this model year most often write about rust: frame rails, cross members and cab supports corroding through, frequently discovered during state inspection, an oil change or when the spare tire carrier drops. A second, smaller group describes brake problems, both rusted-through brake lines and a shuddering or pulsating pedal. The rest are scattered reports of front ball joint wear and a throttle pedal that stops responding.
- Body and structure
Frame and cross member rust-through
- 494 complaints (49%)
- median 109,254 mi at 10.0 yrs old (398 state mileage)
- 6 mention a crash, fire or injury
- owner-quoted repair $2,000 (median of 22 quotes)
- filed 2008–2026
Complaints describe frame rails, rear cross members, cab supports and the spare tire carrier rusting through, sometimes with visible holes or metal flaking off in sheets. Many owners say the condition was found by a mechanic during routine service, an oil change or a state inspection, and that the truck then failed inspection. According to the complaints, dealers inspected the frame, applied a spray treatment in some cases, or declined repairs because of the extent of the corrosion; several owners report being advised not to drive the vehicle. Reported from roughly 35,000 miles to well past 250,000 miles, often after a number of winters of road-salt exposure.
What to check: Put the truck on a lift and inspect the frame rails, rear cross member, cab supports and spare tire carrier for scale, flaking metal and holes before buying. Ask whether the 09V444000 frame inspection or treatment was ever performed and keep the paperwork.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“2000 Toyota Tundra. The frame is rusting underneith the car. Toyota acknowledges this is a problem and shouldn't be happening, but will not fix the issue. Truck will not pass inspection at this time. We are looking at having to pay for this defect out of our own pocket because Toyota will not take responsibility.”
NHTSA complaint #10322887, filed 2010-03, 100,000 miles“Noticed rusting on my 2000 Toyota Tundra about 4--5 years ago didn't think much about it because of Tundra's good reputation surprise' surprise' Tundra went in for some minor repair & was promptly told by my mechanic that the frame was totally rusted & that it was bending while it was up on the lift ......took it to ira Toyota in danvers mass where I purchased it ,again upon inspection by a Toyota mechanic . …”
NHTSA complaint #10291576, filed 2009-11, 105,000 miles - Brakes
Rusted brake lines and shuddering brakes
- 229 complaints (23%)
- median 67,000 mi at 7.9 yrs old (156 state mileage)
- 7 mention a crash, fire or injury
- owner-quoted repair $1,650 (median of 22 quotes)
- filed 2000–2026
Several complaints describe brake tubing along the frame corroding and bursting, with the pedal going to the floor and fluid lost; one owner also reports the parking brake mechanism rusted and not working. Others describe a spongy pedal or a rapid pulsation and steering wheel shake under light to moderate braking, where rotors were turned or replaced and the vibration returned. Owners say dealers either found nothing wrong, resurfaced the rotors, or quoted replacement of pads, rotors and calipers. Reported from very low mileage up to nearly 300,000 miles, with most appearing between about 55,000 and 165,000 miles.
What to check: Have the steel brake lines along the frame and at the proportioning valve checked for rust pitting, and test the pedal feel on a long, light stop to catch any pulsation. Ask when the brake fluid was last changed and whether the rotors have been resurfaced or replaced.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“Rapid pulsating of brakes under light to moderate braking at almost any speed. Suspect a design defect in the anti-lock brake system. Took vehicle to Toyota several times, was told nothing wrong , brake rotors were turned finally after some insistence on my part. Problem seemed to go away but came back. Brakes have been done again and problem still occurs. This phenomenon has been observed in several other Toyota vehicles we have owned, a 1993 camry, a 2001 avalon and a 2005 lexus es330. …”
NHTSA complaint #10583741, filed 2014-04, 2,000 miles“The brake line tubing at the proportioning valve on the left rear inside frame rail corroded and burst causing all brake fluid to escape and the brake pedal went to the floor and made the vehicle difficult to stop. I was traveling close to home at a speed of approximately 25 MPH. I down shifted and was able to slow to 5mph to drive the vehicle to my home garage where I replaced the tubing,fluid and bled the brakes. Fortunately no accident occurred, I discarded the old tubing and fittings after the repairs were made. …”
NHTSA complaint #10294451, filed 2009-12, 111,000 miles - Other or unknown
Throttle pedal stops responding, code P1121
- 58 complaints (6%)
- median 102,584 mi at 10.2 yrs old (40 state mileage)
- 8 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2000–2026
Owners describe the engine losing power or the accelerator going dead while driving, sometimes at highway speed or while pulling a trailer, with the check engine light coming on. In several cases restarting the truck restored normal response, and a scan returned code P1121 pointing to the accelerator pedal position sensor. Complaints say dealers quoted diagnostic fees and repairs of roughly a thousand dollars or more without guaranteeing a fix, and one owner reports the pedal sticking fully engaged until the brakes were applied hard. Mostly reported between about 95,000 and 260,000 miles, often during steady highway driving or while towing.
What to check: Ask whether the accelerator pedal position sensor or throttle body has ever been replaced, and have any stored codes read before purchase. A road test that includes a steady highway pull and a part-throttle acceleration is worth doing.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“While merging into interstate traffic in my 2000 Toyota Tundra v-8, I accelerated to passing gear. The accelerator remained fully engaged. I stomped the brakes hard and fortunately the accelerator disengaged. I had no option because of congested traffic and the median was steep. I have owned this Tundra for several years and experienced this fully engaged accelerator once before. …”
NHTSA complaint #10313996, filed 2010-02, 125,400 miles“While pulling a travel trailer with our 2000 Toyota Tundra sr5-v8, we lost power and the check engine came on. After pulling to the side of the interstate, we shut off the engine. After about 5 minutes, we started the engine again, found we had power, but the check engine was still on. We drove another 100 miles to out destination. After several hours, we started the truck again and the check engine light was not on anymore. …”
NHTSA complaint #10267614, filed 2009-05, 131,000 miles - Suspension
Front ball joint and suspension wear
- 58 complaints (6%)
- median 111,000 mi at 10.7 yrs old (49 state mileage)
- 5 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2004–2026
Complaints describe front ball joints failing at relatively low mileage, with the steering pulling or wandering, clicking from the front end over bumps or when the brake pedal is pressed. One owner reports the upper ball joints were replaced and failed again within about 20,000 miles, and another describes a fractured front stabilizer along with the rust found underneath. Repairs reported are replacement of upper and lower ball joints, and in one case the axle as well. Most often reported between about 50,000 and 70,000 miles, with a few at much higher mileage.
What to check: Have the front end raised and the upper and lower ball joints checked for play, and listen for clicking while turning the wheels at low speed. Ask whether the ball joints have been replaced and when.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“The lower ball joint on my 2000 Toyota Tundra went out while driving at a speed less then 30 MPH it only has 69,000. Miles this could have been deadly if we where on a main road, or even going at a higher speed......”
NHTSA complaint #10335562, filed 2010-06, 67,000 miles“The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. During routine inspection a mechanic discovered that the carriage frame had corroded. The frames left rear corner had a hole inch in diameter, and the right front stabilizer was fractured. The failure and current mileages were 113,000. The VIN was not available.”
NHTSA complaint #10293197, filed 2009-11, 113,000 miles
Buying note. Because rust underneath is the dominant theme in the complaints, a lift inspection before purchase matters more than cosmetic condition on this model year. Budget for a thorough underbody check and a brake line review, and ask for any recall or rust-treatment paperwork.
Summary written with AI from a sample of 60 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.
NHTSA recorded 1,011 consumer complaints for the 2000 Toyota Tundra. 689 of the complaints include a mileage, and 18% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 99,665 miles. Of all complaints, 43 involved a crash, 5 a fire, 39 an injury, 1 a death, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns and 84 technical service bulletins for this model year.
Not compared (before 2008). Model years 2008–2023 of the same vehicle that have at least 25 complaints are compared, and a model needs at least 3 of them.
Which parts are reported most
Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.
- Body and structure529 52%
- Brakes276 27%
- Suspension100 9.9%
- Transmission and drivetrain51 5.0%
- Engine cooling44 4.3%
- Steering43 4.3%
- Other or unknown34 3.4%
- Fuel system22 2.2%
- Vehicle speed control20 2.0%
- Air bags19 1.9%
Also reported: Tires (19), Seat belts (18), Electrical system (11), Exterior lighting (9), Wheels (9), Engine (8), Equipment (8), Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors) (5), Latches, locks and linkages (4), Interior lighting (2), Electronic stability control (1).
Example complaints
Body and structure: “The frame is damaged and was told my manufacture was supposed to replace with a new one. The truck looks to be bent in between the middle. I took it to my local dealer and they are having me pay for other areas and not replacing the frame even though it's under recall.”
NHTSA complaint #11396455, filed 2021-02, 133,000 milesBrakes: “1. Slow loss of brake pressure due to low brake fluid levels (occurred over a span of 3-4 hours) 2. Total loss of brakes on all 4 wheels. Fortunately, I was towing a trailer at the time and the trailer brakes allowed me to stop safely. First time this has ever occurred. Failure was due to rusted lines. 3. Rear brake lines were replaced. I did not keep the old lines.”
NHTSA complaint #10288625, filed 2009-10, 135,000 milesSuspension: “Driving home from work 1-28-2015 my 2000 Toyota Tundra,without warning the front driver side slammed to the ground sliding to a dead stop the tire jammed under the body of the truck,very frightening to think what if I was driving faster or if another car was coming towards you or from behind,after calling a tow truck and getting the vehicle off the ground we were able to see the ball joint failed.”
NHTSA complaint #10679817, filed 2015-01, 260,000 milesTransmission and drivetrain: “At 80,000 miles my transmission needs to be replaced . I have never abused this vehicle in any form and feel that Toyota should reimburse the many thousands of owners who seem to be having the same problems with this model. For the amount of money these vehicles cost it only seems fair that Toyota should be forced to stand behind their products.”
NHTSA complaint #10261894, filed 2009-03, 80,000 milesMileage when problems were reported
18% of the 689 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 60,000 and 135,000 miles.
Complaints by year filed
Trend: falling. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
Crash test ratings
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 2000 Toyota Tundra. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.
| Version | Overall | Frontal | Side | Side pole | Rollover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra · coupe | not rated | 4 / 3 | — | — | — |
Ratings before the 2011 model year come from an older, less demanding test and are not comparable with ratings for 2011 and later.
Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.
Fuel economy and running cost
EPA ratings for each 2000 Toyota Tundra version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).
| Version | Engine | Transmission | City | Hwy | Comb. | Fuel / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra 2WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 2WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 5-speed manual | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 2WD | 4.7L 8-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 14 | 16 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 3.4L 6-cyl | 5-speed manual | 14 | 16 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 4.7L 8-cyl | 4-speed automatic | 13 | 16 | 14 | $4,800 |
Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.
Recalls and investigations
- 09V444000Nov 18, 2009Structure › Frame and members › Underbody shieldsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2000–2003
Toyota is recalling model year 2000-2003 tundra vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the following states: connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, new hampshire, new jersey…
- 02V129000May 1, 2002WheelsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2000–2002, Sequoia 2001–2002
On certain 4x2 vehicles equipped with an alloy wheel tire upgrade (options wm4, wm8, zl1-zl4, dh4, or dh5) installed by the processing centers in jacksonville, florida or commerce, georgia, a label identifying the spare tire as a temporary use spare tire was…
- 99V347003Jan 18, 2000Exterior lighting › Tail lightsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2000
Vehicle description: light duty trucks. The tail light socket may have been improperly molded, resulting in the locking tab having insufficient force to retain the bulb.
Recall details for the 2000 Toyota Tundra → · Check a VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls
NHTSA investigations
- PE09049Frame corrosionClosed · Oct 6, 2009
Technical service bulletins
TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 84 on record; the latest 10 are shown.
- 11012744Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11012743Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11012742Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11012735Dec 5, 2024Body and structure. Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail…
- 11012727Dec 3, 2024Body and structure. Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type…
- 11007445Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11007444Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11007443Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11006151Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11006150Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
Other model years of the Toyota Tundra
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | Crash ★ | MPG | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36 | 6,000 | 1 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2025 | 141 | 4,605 | 5 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2024 | 350 | 15,000 | 10 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2023 | 412 | 30,000 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Too new |
| 2022 | 432 | 28,500 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Rising |
| 2021 | 24 | 18,000 | 2 | 4 | 15 | — | Rising |
| 2020 | 47 | 3,000 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 50 · Typical | Falling |
| 2019 | 74 | 17,256 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 59 · Typical | Stable |
| 2018 | 100 | 7,900 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 69 · More | Stable |
| 2017 | 78 | 16,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 42 · Typical | Stable |
| 2016 | 120 | 15,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 75 · More | Stable |
| 2015 | 51 | 57,000 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 5 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2014 | 93 | 40,000 | 4 | 3–4 | 17 | 32 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2013 | 85 | 53,250 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 27 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2012 | 156 | 78,893 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 31 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2011 | 134 | 69,500 | 10 | 4 | 17 | 44 · Typical | Falling |
| 2010 | 163 | 41,630 | 15 | — | 16 | 79 · More | Falling |
| 2009 | 38 | 60,000 | 12 | — | 16 | 26 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2008 | 327 | 42,396 | 12 | — | 16 | 100 · More | Falling |
| 2007 | 390 | 48,210 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2006 | 545 | 96,000 | 10 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2005 | 377 | 82,225 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2004 | 466 | 102,000 | 8 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2003 | 399 | 98,564 | 7 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2002 | 482 | 91,100 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2001 | 415 | 102,000 | 2 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Stable |
| 2000 | 1,011 | 99,665 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
All Toyota Tundra model years · Best and worst years by complaints
Frequently asked questions
What are the most common problems with the 2000 Toyota Tundra?
Owners of this model year most often write about rust: frame rails, cross members and cab supports corroding through, frequently discovered during state inspection, an oil change or when the spare tire carrier drops. The issues reported most often: Frame and cross member rust-through; Rusted brake lines and shuddering brakes; Throttle pedal stops responding, code P1121.
How many NHTSA complaints does the 2000 Toyota Tundra have?
NHTSA recorded 1,011 consumer complaints for the 2000 Toyota Tundra as of Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.
What part of the 2000 Toyota Tundra is reported most often?
Body and structure is named most often, in 529 complaints (52% of the total), followed by brakes with 276.
Has the 2000 Toyota Tundra been recalled?
NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns for this model year. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
What gas mileage does the 2000 Toyota Tundra get?
The EPA rates the 2000 Toyota Tundra (Tundra 2WD, 3.4L 6-cyl) at 16 mpg combined, 15 city and 18 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $4,200 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.
At what mileage are problems with the 2000 Toyota Tundra reported?
Among the 689 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 99,665 miles and the middle half falls between 60,000 and 135,000 miles; 18% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 29, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).
Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.