2013 Toyota Tundra Problems
Compared with other Toyota Tundra years
Fewer complaints than typical for this model
27/100 0.6× a typical year · 50 = typical
- Complaint rate is 0.6× that of a typical Toyota Tundra year, weighted for crashes, fires, injuries, recalls and mileage, and allowing for the era and for how long each year has had to collect complaints.
- 21 of its 85 complaints were filed by the end of 2015.
- Most reported problem: Steering vibration, noise and fluid leaks (37 complaints, median 34,000 mi).
- 5 recall campaigns on record. A VIN search at nhtsa.gov/recalls shows open recalls for a specific vehicle.
Based only on NHTSA complaints, recalls and investigations. Not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold, and not a reliability rating. How this is calculated
- Complaints
- 85filed with NHTSA
- Median mileage
- 53,250miles, 64 complaints with mileage
- Recalls
- 5campaigns on record
- Trend
- FallingComplaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
- NHTSA crash rating
- 4 / 5stars overall, 6 rated versions
- EPA fuel economy
- 17 mpgcombined, 4.0L 6-cyl RWD · 16 city / 20 hwy
Sources: NHTSA records for the 2013 Toyota Tundra (complaints, recalls, investigations), NHTSA crash tests, EPA fuel economy. Report an error
What owners report
Owners of the 2013 Tundra most often describe engine oil leaks around the cam tower seals that drip onto the exhaust, and air injection pump failures that trigger warning lights and reduced power. Steering and vibration complaints also appear, many reported at low mileage, while fuel-economy and hard-start reports cluster higher in the odometer range.
- Engine
Air injection pump failure / check engine light
- 12 complaints (14%)
- median 98,000 mi at 6.6 yrs old (9 state mileage, few)
- owner-quoted repair $3,000 (median of 5 quotes)
- filed 2017–2024
Complaints describe the check engine light coming on and diagnosis of a failed or moisture-contaminated secondary air injection pump or valve. Owners report hard starting, rough running, reduced power or limp mode, and repair estimates in the thousands; some mention that earlier model years had a related recall or customer support program but their truck was not included. Mostly reported between about 40,000 and 130,000 miles, often after several years of use.
What to check: Ask whether the air injection pump and valves have been replaced, and have a pre-purchase scan done for stored codes related to the secondary air system. Confirm the check engine light is not on at start-up.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“On two different occasions I was driving my Tundra on the freeway at approx. 70 MPH. My truck lost power and I almost caused accidents on both instances since I could not accelerate past 40 MPH. I had to manage my way out of the freeway to a safe place. 2two diagnostics were performed and I received codes p0418, p1604, c1241, p2445, p2441. …”
NHTSA complaint #11362059, filed 2020-09, 58,000 miles“Driving on interstate the truck all of sudden looses power and. Dash warning lights come on and I have extremely hard time getting truck to side of road safety without power. Took to shop said I had air injection pump water intrusion and it was common issues with most of Tundra they have recalled early years before mine and it's a $4000 bill my truck has 120000 miles on it. Please help”
NHTSA complaint #11206369, filed 2019-05, 120,000 miles - Steering
Steering vibration, noise and fluid leaks
- 37 complaints (44%)
- median 34,000 mi at 3.7 yrs old (29 state mileage)
- 4 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2013–2025
Owners describe vibration through the steering wheel and gas pedal at certain engine speeds or under load, abnormal noises from the steering column or intermediate shaft, and power steering fluid leaks. Some complaints mention low fluid, a failed seal, or a steering rack quoted for replacement, and a few say the dealer called the vibration normal. Reported from very low mileage (a few hundred miles) up to about 142,000 miles, with vibration cases often under 15,000 miles.
What to check: Check the power steering fluid level and look for seepage around the steering gear and rack. Test drive at highway speed and under acceleration to feel for steering-wheel vibration or unusual noises.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“I was pulling into a parking spot when my power steering went out. I checked the fluid and the fluid level was low. I called Toyota customer care and they sent a tow truck to pick up my vehicle and deliver it to the nearest dealership. While loading the truck, a seal popped on the steering arm and fluid started leaking out. Springhill Toyota is not honoring my manufacture or extended warranty because I have added heavy duty coil springs to support my road armor bumper I installed for extra protection. …”
NHTSA complaint #10554809, filed 2013-12, 15,500 miles“I took my 2013 Toyota Tundra in for a routine 55,000 mile service and they informed me that the steering rack is filling with fluid and I could have it sieze up on me while driving. I purchased all warranties good until 2020 but they feel this design flaw should be covered by me the consumer. I was quoted $3000.00+ for the repair. I bought this truck after putting 100,000+ on 2006 Tundra with nothing close to this is repairs. What is going on? The steering can sieze up, and this isn't a recall? Why would I buy another Toyota? …”
NHTSA complaint #11051621, filed 2017-11, 55,000 miles - Engine
Cam tower oil leak onto exhaust
- 10 complaints (12%)
- median 49,058 mi at 4.8 yrs old (8 state mileage, few)
- 2 mention a crash, fire or injury
- filed 2015–2022
Owners describe engine oil seeping from the cam tower seals, often on both sides of the engine, and running down onto the exhaust manifold or heat shield. Complaints mention a burning oil smell, smoke from under the hood, and oil visible on the engine block; several say a dealer diagnosed the leak and performed a major reseal, while others report the dealer denied the leak or that repairs were not covered outside warranty. Reported from roughly 11,000 to 130,000 miles, with several cases noted between 23,000 and 65,000 miles.
What to check: Look for oil residue and dark staining on the exhaust manifold and heat shield, and check for a burning smell after a drive. Ask whether the cam tower seals have been resealed and whether any related repair is documented.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“I would like your help in assessing the possible danger from an active excessive oil leak from the cam tower on the 2013 Tundra. This relatively new truck leaked oil all over the engine without my knowledge until I brought it in for service. I was told this could have lead to an auto fire and since I am a disabled senior this is terrifying. A brief review of the internet literature shows that this leaking cam tower seal is a common problem and can happen repetitively because of a manufacture defect in the cam tower cover and seals. …”
NHTSA complaint #10676450, filed 2015-01, 11,321 miles“Continuous oil leak from cam tower onto exhaust manifold. Dealer denied the issue even though the signs are very obvious. A call to Toyota to got me no where. They denied the issue like the dealer. There is oil on the engine block and also the exhaust manifold is black from the all of the oil dripping. After driving for awhile the car smells like it's burning. There is a very real potential for fire. The issue appears to be widespread. A quick internet search can find extensive examples. …”
NHTSA complaint #10758974, filed 2015-08, 43,117 miles - Fuel system
Rough running and hard starts (fuel/ECU)
- 6 complaints (7%)
- median 55,000 mi at 5.7 yrs old (5 state mileage, few)
- filed 2013–2020
Complaints describe hard starting that takes several attempts, rough idle, loss of power, and lower fuel economy, with owners linking it to fuel pump or ECU calibration issues. Some mention a prior software reflash that did not resolve the problem, and others report the dealer could not identify a lasting fix. Generally reported between about 25,000 and 90,000 miles, with several cases above 50,000 miles.
What to check: Start the truck from cold and note whether it catches immediately or needs several tries. Ask whether any ECU reflash or fuel pump work has been done, and check for records of repeat visits for the same symptom.
2 excerpts from owner complaints in NHTSA records
“Toyota dealer and Toyota technical support are unable to fix the problem associated with t-sb-0058-13. This is the second time within 3 months or so that I have taken my 2013 Toyota Tundra in for this fix. Fuel economy drops on average of 30-40%. Toyota refuse to acknowledge that this is an issue, and is refusing to cover costs associated with fixing this recurring problem. This has been stated as a software gliche, and there are no parts to replace. …”
NHTSA complaint #11076846, filed 2018-03, 90,000 miles“Ecu problem. Since june 2018, I have started to see decreased mpg (avg 9 mpg, 50/50) and vehicle exhibiting high alc. Density % when fueled with e0/e10 gas. No DTC codes, but extended crank exhibited, poor performance and shifting observed. This is a flex vehicle. Fuel trims were way into negative and I have called Toyota and filed a case when this happened, but was out of warranty by 2 months.(called aug 2018) vehicle had 55k miles. They said its up to the dealership to remedy the issue. …”
NHTSA complaint #11256330, filed 2019-09, 55,000 miles
Buying note. Have a pre-purchase inspection focus on oil residue around the cam tower and exhaust, stored air-injection codes, and steering or seat hardware play. Service records showing reseals, pump replacement, or software updates are worth asking for.
Summary written with AI from a sample of 60 NHTSA complaints for this model year (picked at random, with complaints that state a mileage and recent ones taken first), then checked automatically against the source records. Where a problem shows a complaint count, every complaint for this model year was matched with fixed keyword rules (written with AI and tested against the sample), and the mileage, age and repair figures are calculated from those complaints; owners' figures are as stated, not verified. Other counts refer to the sample. The excerpts come from NHTSA's public complaint records and are unverified; capitalisation is normalised, NHTSA staff notes are removed, and shortened text ends with “…”. Something wrong? Request a correction.
NHTSA recorded 85 consumer complaints for the 2013 Toyota Tundra. 64 of the complaints include a mileage, and 47% of those were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the median is 53,250 miles. Of all complaints, 4 involved a crash, 3 a fire, 3 an injury, according to the filers. NHTSA lists 5 recall campaigns and 331 technical service bulletins for this model year. Compared with the other 14 Toyota Tundra model years that have at least 25 complaints and are old enough to compare, this one scores 27 out of 100, where 50 is a typical year for the model (fewer complaints than typical for this model). The comparison allows for the era and for how long each year has had to collect complaints, but not for how many vehicles were sold.
Which parts are reported most
Complaints can name more than one part, so the counts add up to more than the total. Select a part to see its complaints, recalls and bulletins.
- Engine23 27%
- Fuel system13 15%
- Electrical system11 13%
- Steering10 12%
- Body and structure7 8.2%
- Other or unknown6 7.1%
- Seat belts5 5.9%
- Wheels5 5.9%
- Air bags4 4.7%
- Brakes4 4.7%
Also reported: Vehicle speed control (4), Exterior lighting (3), Suspension (3), Seats (2), Tires (2), Visibility (wipers, defrost, mirrors) (2), Engine cooling (1).
Example complaints
Engine: “My 2013 Toyota Tundra truck ( 74,734 miles) suddenly had engine failure while driving down an incline at 48 MPH. I lost power steering and power brakes. After eventually pulling the wheel with much effort and using the emergency brake I was able to get the truck off to the side of the road. I turned the key and the engine started right away and I was able to drive again but only at a reduced speed of 40 MPH or less ( it's called limp mode) my mechanic diagnosed it as a secondary air injection pump failure. …”
NHTSA complaint #11329510, filed 2020-06, 74,734 milesFuel system: “I was driving and out of nowhere my engine light comes on. I take it to auto zone to do a quick check and I was informed that it is my injection pumps that are bad. I did research and in the past Toyota has had to recall for this exact problem on the exact vehicle but it was for a different year. I called Toyota and they said my vehicle year does not fall into the recall but I'm sure that it is the exact thing.”
NHTSA complaint #11131859, filed 2018-09, 109,300 milesElectrical system: “Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2013 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while the vehicle was taken to a local dealer for repairs, it was discovered that there was a mileage discrepancy. The vehicle was an independent dealer sale. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 84,00 and upon inspection at a local dealer, it was discovered that the mileage was 175,000.”
NHTSA complaint #11654986, filed 2025-04, 175,000 milesSteering: “On march 6 of 2014 I had brought my 2013 Toyota Tundra in for a very bad vibration issue coming from the bottom it turns out when they inspected the truck that driveshaft had to be repacked I was in a rental car for two inconvenience me for those two days with no truck that I bought to have and use finally got the truck back everything seems okay and then on 531 of 14 which is approximately two months after the first incident my truck was again brought in for a issue coming from the rear end now they stated me that my wheel bearing had went went bad with proximately only 11,256 miles I'm no…”
NHTSA complaint #10669199, filed 2014-12, 8,750 milesMileage when problems were reported
47% of the 64 complaints with a mileage were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles; the middle half falls between 15,500 and 79,000 miles.
Complaints by year filed
Trend: falling. Complaints filed in the last 3 full calendar years are at least 25% lower than in the 3 years before.
Crash test ratings
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings for the 2013 Toyota Tundra. Frontal results are shown driver / passenger; rollover shows the star rating and NHTSA's estimated risk of rolling over in a single-vehicle crash.
| Version | Overall | Frontal | Side | Side pole | Rollover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra · crew cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · extended cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · regular cab 2WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 · 20.4% risk |
| Tundra · regular cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
| Tundra · extended cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
| Tundra · crew cab 4WD | ★★★★☆ | 4 / 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 · 19.8% risk |
Neighbouring years: 2012: same overall rating; 2014: 3–4 stars overall. A redesign between years can change both the car and the test.
Source: NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (5-Star Safety Ratings), nhtsa.gov/ratings.
Fuel economy and running cost
EPA ratings for each 2013 Toyota Tundra version. Annual fuel cost is the EPA's estimate at its current fuel prices for 15,000 miles a year (55% city driving).
| Version | Engine | Transmission | City | Hwy | Comb. | Fuel / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tundra 2WD | 4.0L 6-cyl | 5-speed automatic | 16 | 20 | 17 | $3,950 |
| Tundra 2WD | 4.6L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,950 |
| Tundra 2WD | 5.7L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 13 | 18 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD | 4.6L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 14 | 19 | 16 | $4,200 |
| Tundra 4WD | 5.7L 8-cyl | 6-speed automatic | 13 | 17 | 15 | $4,450 |
| Tundra 4WD FFV | 5.7L 8-cyl · flex-fuel | 6-speed automatic | 13 | 18 | 15 | $4,450 |
Source: U.S. EPA and Department of Energy, fueleconomy.gov. Ratings are for comparing vehicles; real-world mileage varies with driving and conditions.
Recalls and investigations
- 21V920000Nov 23, 2021Steering › Hydraulic power assist systemCovers: Toyota Tundra 2007–2021, Sequoia 2008–2019, 2021–2022
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2008-2022 Sequoia and 2007-2021 Tundra vehicles. The power steering gear assembly may have been manufactured incorrectly, which can result in an oil leak.
- 17V311000May 11, 2017Wheels › Lugs/nuts/bolts/studsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2013–2017, Sequoia 2013–2017
Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain model year 2013-2017 Toyota Tundra and Sequoia vehicles accessorized with Southeast Toyota accessory 20-inch Rockstar wheels installed by Southeast Toyota or a Southeast Toyota dealer. The…
- 14V429000Jul 16, 2014Wheels › Lugs/nuts/bolts/studsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2013–2014
Gulf States Toyota, Inc. (GST) is recalling certain model year 2013-2014 Toyota Tundra vehicles modified by GST as part of certain vehicle packages to be equipped with a combination of non-Toyota-brand 20-inch alloy wheels and chrome plated lug nuts. The…
- 13V123000Apr 9, 2013Equipment › Other › LabelsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2008, 2010–2013, Tacoma 2010–2013, Highlander 2010–2013 +16 more
Southeast Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 and 2010-2013 Toyota Tundra, 2010-2012 Rav4, 2012 Toyota Sequoia, 2010-2011 Toyota Corolla, 2010-2011 Toyota Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota FJ…
- 13V014000Jan 16, 2013SeatsCovers: Toyota Tundra 2010–2013, Highlander 2009–2013, Venza 2009–2013 +13 more
Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain models interspersed through model years 2009 through 2013 as follows: model year 2009-2012 Tacoma, 4Runner, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Prius, and RAV4; model year 2009-2010 Avalon, FJ Cruiser, and…
Recall details for the 2013 Toyota Tundra → · Check a VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls
Technical service bulletins
TSBs are manufacturer notes to dealers about known repair procedures. They are not recalls and do not by themselves mean a vehicle has a fault. 331 on record; the latest 10 are shown.
- 11028712Jan 7, 2026Other or unknown. Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11020657Jun 13, 2025Electrical system. The air conditioning dye injection tool kit has been developed to aid in identifying the location of air conditioning refrigerant leaks. The procedures outlined in this Service Bulletin aid in…
- 11012744Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
- 11012743Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the…
- 11012742Dec 6, 2024Body and structure. Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle…
- 11012735Dec 5, 2024Body and structure. Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail…
- 11012727Dec 3, 2024Body and structure. Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type…
- 11007455Jul 29, 2024Body and structure. Some 2005 – 2024 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11006161Jul 29, 2024Body and structure. Some 2005 – 2024 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and…
- 11007445Jul 12, 2024Body and structure. The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these…
Other model years of the Toyota Tundra
| Year | Complaints | Median mi | Recalls | Crash ★ | MPG | Score (50 = typical) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36 | 6,000 | 1 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2025 | 141 | 4,605 | 5 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2024 | 350 | 15,000 | 10 | 5 | 20 | Too new to compare | Too new |
| 2023 | 412 | 30,000 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Too new |
| 2022 | 432 | 28,500 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 100 · More | Rising |
| 2021 | 24 | 18,000 | 2 | 4 | 15 | — | Rising |
| 2020 | 47 | 3,000 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 50 · Typical | Falling |
| 2019 | 74 | 17,256 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 59 · Typical | Stable |
| 2018 | 100 | 7,900 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 69 · More | Stable |
| 2017 | 78 | 16,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 42 · Typical | Stable |
| 2016 | 120 | 15,000 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 75 · More | Stable |
| 2015 | 51 | 57,000 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 5 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2014 | 93 | 40,000 | 4 | 3–4 | 17 | 32 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2013 | 85 | 53,250 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 27 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2012 | 156 | 78,893 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 31 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2011 | 134 | 69,500 | 10 | 4 | 17 | 44 · Typical | Falling |
| 2010 | 163 | 41,630 | 15 | — | 16 | 79 · More | Falling |
| 2009 | 38 | 60,000 | 12 | — | 16 | 26 · Fewer | Falling |
| 2008 | 327 | 42,396 | 12 | — | 16 | 100 · More | Falling |
| 2007 | 390 | 48,210 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2006 | 545 | 96,000 | 10 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2005 | 377 | 82,225 | 12 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2004 | 466 | 102,000 | 8 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2003 | 399 | 98,564 | 7 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2002 | 482 | 91,100 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
| 2001 | 415 | 102,000 | 2 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Stable |
| 2000 | 1,011 | 99,665 | 3 | — | 16 | Not compared (before 2008) | Falling |
All Toyota Tundra model years · Best and worst years by complaints
Frequently asked questions
What are the most common problems with the 2013 Toyota Tundra?
Owners of the 2013 Tundra most often describe engine oil leaks around the cam tower seals that drip onto the exhaust, and air injection pump failures that trigger warning lights and reduced power. The issues reported most often: Air injection pump failure / check engine light; Steering vibration, noise and fluid leaks; Cam tower oil leak onto exhaust.
How many NHTSA complaints does the 2013 Toyota Tundra have?
NHTSA recorded 85 consumer complaints for the 2013 Toyota Tundra as of Oct 30, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate.
What part of the 2013 Toyota Tundra is reported most often?
Engine is named most often, in 23 complaints (27% of the total), followed by fuel system with 13.
Has the 2013 Toyota Tundra been recalled?
NHTSA lists 5 recall campaigns for this model year. To check a specific vehicle, enter its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
How did the 2013 Toyota Tundra do in NHTSA crash tests?
NHTSA's 5-Star Safety Ratings give the 2013 Toyota Tundra 4 out of 5 stars overall, across 6 rated versions (body style and drive). Ratings from different model years are only comparable when the vehicle was not redesigned in between.
What gas mileage does the 2013 Toyota Tundra get?
The EPA rates the 2013 Toyota Tundra (Tundra 2WD, 4.0L 6-cyl) at 17 mpg combined, 16 city and 20 highway, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,950 at 15,000 miles a year. Other engine and drive versions are rated differently.
At what mileage are problems with the 2013 Toyota Tundra reported?
Among the 64 complaints that include a mileage, the median is 53,250 miles and the middle half falls between 15,500 and 79,000 miles; 47% were filed for vehicles with under 50,000 miles.
About this data. Data from NHTSA (ODI) complaints, recalls, TSBs and investigations, updated Oct 30, 2026. Complaints are unverified consumer reports and may be duplicated or inaccurate. Crash ratings are from NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program. Fuel economy is from the EPA and DOE (fueleconomy.gov).
Complaint counts come from NHTSA’s public complaint database; we count each complaint once. The source records for this vehicle are on nhtsa.gov. Scores and trends are our own summaries of that data, described in the methodology. This page is not legal, safety or repair advice: for a specific vehicle, check its VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls and ask a qualified mechanic. See an error? Tell us.